{
  "id": 5101372,
  "name": "Ella J. Culver v. C. F. Schroth and Henry Ahrens",
  "name_abbreviation": "Culver v. Schroth",
  "decision_date": "1894-04-30",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "643",
  "last_page": "644",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "54 Ill. App. 643"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "46 Ill. App. 562",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5148916
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/46/0562-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "35 Ill. App. 448",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5006760
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/35/0448-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "44 Ill. App. 48",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5070493
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/44/0048-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "50 Ill. App. 168",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5123362
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/50/0168-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 166,
    "char_count": 1713,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.485,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.427254189765559e-08,
      "percentile": 0.443670847219278
    },
    "sha256": "7fcac36ba442753a7a1b810122a86714d97383d82046839cdeb95c5d0fa33806",
    "simhash": "1:fa0bfee4d111a6a8",
    "word_count": 303
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:51.601388+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ella J. Culver v. C. F. Schroth and Henry Ahrens."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nHad a complete transcript of the record from the court below been filed, it would probably have appeared that the appellant, a purchaser pendente lite, and therefore bound by all the former proceedings in the cause (Williams v. Winans, 20 N. J. Eq. (5 C. E. Green) 392), is now seeking to have this court reverse its decision in this same case on a former appeal. Schroth v. Black, 50 Ill. App. 168.\nThat former decision is the law of the case for this court. C. M. & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Hoyt, 44 Ill. App. 48.\nBut by a praecipe for part only of the record, followed by the clerk in making up and certifying the transcript \u201c as per praecipe,\u201d the object of this appeal is not so apparent.\nWe have so often held that transcripts \u201c as per praecipe \u201d are insufficient, that we will not repeat the reasons. Wilkenson v. Linden Steel Co., 35 Ill. App. 448; Alling v. Wenzell, 46 Ill. App. 562. These cases having been many times followed since.\nHot having before us the complete case as the Circuit Court had it, we do not know whether any error was committed or not, and therefore affirm the decree.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Louis Boisot, Jr., attorney for appellant.",
      "Pease & McEwen, attorneys for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ella J. Culver v. C. F. Schroth and Henry Ahrens.\n1. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Insufficient Transcript.\u2014Transcripts \u201c as per praecipe \u201d are insufficient.\n2. Same\u2014Res Adjudicata.\u2014A former decision of this court in a case is the law of the case for this court.\nMemor\u00eduidmn,\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1894,\nand affirmed.\nOpinion filed April 30, 1894.\nThe opinion states the case.\nLouis Boisot, Jr., attorney for appellant.\nPease & McEwen, attorneys for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0643-01",
  "first_page_order": 641,
  "last_page_order": 642
}