{
  "id": 5099147,
  "name": "Emil Gasch et al. v. C. L. Niehoff",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gasch v. Niehoff",
  "decision_date": "1894-05-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "680",
  "last_page": "681",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "54 Ill. App. 680"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 1029,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.507,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7519295526495946
    },
    "sha256": "8b402b6e64925727db705c8540707871710a21176f5bb9635e6ac62132ab0b48",
    "simhash": "1:101769f90f99b45c",
    "word_count": 173
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:51.601388+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Emil Gasch et al. v. C. L. Niehoff."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Waterman\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nIssues were joined upon the allegations upon which the writ of attachment was issued, with the result that the jury found for the defendant.\nWe do not agree with appellants in their contention that the evidence was such that we ought to set aside the conclusion reached by the court and jury before whom the cause was tried.\nHo other ground for a reversal is urged. The judgment is therefore affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Waterman"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Kraft & Kraft and F. M. Williams, attorneys for appellants.",
      "Albert H. Meads, attorney for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Emil Gasch et al. v. C. L. Niehoff.\n1. Verdict\u2014Evidence Sustains the Finding.\u2014Where issues are joined on the allegations upon which a writ of attachment has been issued, and found for the defendant, the Appellate Court declines to interfere.\nMemorandum.\u2014Attachment. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Francis Adams, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1894,\nand affirmed.\nOpinion filed May 28, 1894.\nThe opinion states the case.\nKraft & Kraft and F. M. Williams, attorneys for appellants.\nAlbert H. Meads, attorney for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0680-01",
  "first_page_order": 678,
  "last_page_order": 679
}