{
  "id": 5096006,
  "name": "Robert P. Wilson v. Adolph Moses and Max Pam",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wilson v. Moses",
  "decision_date": "1894-10-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "230",
  "last_page": "231",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "55 Ill. App. 230"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "91 Ill. 602",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2753588
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/91/0602-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "84 Ill. 96",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2654464
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/84/0096-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "33 Ill. App. 73",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4987915
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/33/0073-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1691,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.48,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.380125665320789e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3927163321104821
    },
    "sha256": "959bd1f8a27204717b2580c7ae1baba06d24e6c009c20688c5e83bcdf861d3f6",
    "simhash": "1:65e130b078aea848",
    "word_count": 292
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:55:31.699098+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Robert P. Wilson v. Adolph Moses and Max Pam."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion oe the Court.\nThis was an appeal by the appellant here, from the judgment of a justice, perfected by filing the bond with him on the 16th of February, 1892, and the bond and transcript were filed in the Circuit Court March 10, 1892.\nMo appearance was filed by the appellees there nor here, and nothing done in the case until March 12, 1894, when the record states that the cause was called for trial and the appeal dismissed with procedendo, for want of prosecution, on motion of the plaintiffs\u2019 attorney. This was regular. Bessy v. Ruhland, 33 Ill. App. 73.\nThe statement in the abstract\u2014contrary to the record\u2014 that the dismissal was upon a preliminary call, can not be regarded. The appellant urges that the plaintiffs should have been required to prove up their cause, and were not entitled to a procedendo. The decisions are the other way. Reed v. Driscoll, 84 Ill. 96; Lawler v. Gordon, 91 Ill. 602.\nThe judgment is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John F. McGoobty, attorney for appellant.",
      "Henby H. Kennedy and Joseph W. Moses, attorneys for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Robert P. Wilson v. Adolph Moses and Max Pam.\n1. Procedendo\u2014On. Dismissal of Appeal.\u2014When a case pending in the Circuit Court for trial on appeal from a justice court is called for trial and the appeal dismissed for want of prosecution, it is proper to award a procedendo to the justice, upon motion of the plaintiff\u2019s attorney without proof.\nMemorandum.\u2014Appeal from Justice\u2019s Court. Dismissed for want of prosecution, by the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Thomas B. Windes, Judge, presiding. Appeal by defendant. Heard in this court at the October term, 1894, and affirmed.\nOpinion filed October 22, 1894.\nJohn F. McGoobty, attorney for appellant.\nHenby H. Kennedy and Joseph W. Moses, attorneys for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0230-01",
  "first_page_order": 226,
  "last_page_order": 227
}