{
  "id": 5096664,
  "name": "Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Eva Katlinsky et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Katlinsky",
  "decision_date": "1894-11-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "284",
  "last_page": "284",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "55 Ill. App. 284"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "6 Ill. App. 325",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4748628
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/6/0325-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "35 Ill. App. 300",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5004340
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/35/0300-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1358,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.482,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.1553030697928721
    },
    "sha256": "c1c281948081f09bd4d8ed142165c87e4fa1e73a41d0cd90541f47c8c020d583",
    "simhash": "1:392bee6d4a0fd189",
    "word_count": 232
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:55:31.699098+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Eva Katlinsky et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThe circuit judge declined in this case to follow the opinion of this court in Maxwell v. Koeritz, 35 Ill. App. 300, holding that Sec. 4, Chap. 82, Liens, did not include, or relate to, sub-contractors. In so doing he ivas entirely justified by the 17th section of the act of 1877, establishing Appellate Courts, which provides that the opinions of the Appellate Courts \u201c shall not be of binding authority in any cause or proceeding other than that in which they may be filed.\u201d\nBut now we give an opinion that Maxwell v. Koeritz was rightly decided here, and that opinion it will be his duty to follow. Oldershaw v. Knoles, 6 Ill. App. 325.\nThe decree dismissing the bill is reversed and the cause remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. G. Beckley, attorney for appellant.",
      "Charles H. Aldrich, attorney for the appellee Eva Katlinsky."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Eva Katlinsky et al.\n1. Appellate Court Opinions\u2014Not Binding in Other Cases.\u2014The opinions of the Appellate Courts are not of binding authority in any cause or proceeding other than that in which they ai\u00bbe filed.\nMemorandum.\u2014Chancery proceedings. In the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Bill dismissed; appeal by complainant. Heard in this court at the October term, 1894. Reversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed November 12, 1894.\nW. G. Beckley, attorney for appellant.\nCharles H. Aldrich, attorney for the appellee Eva Katlinsky."
  },
  "file_name": "0284-01",
  "first_page_order": 280,
  "last_page_order": 280
}