{
  "id": 5095621,
  "name": "Patrick J. Carey, and John H. Rollins, Trustee, v. Jacob Scherer, Jr., Elizabeth Scherer, and William Drieske",
  "name_abbreviation": "Carey v. Scherer",
  "decision_date": "1894-12-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "421",
  "last_page": "422",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "55 Ill. App. 421"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "19 Ill. 64",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        441644
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/19/0064-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 149,
    "char_count": 2098,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.541,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.1552938028433318
    },
    "sha256": "095c7f582bbabb34c485f97badc6c07464e48bc1ce1a6c63def6be6fe03c5368",
    "simhash": "1:0a010454742c1656",
    "word_count": 353
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:55:31.699098+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Patrick J. Carey, and John H. Rollins, Trustee, v. Jacob Scherer, Jr., Elizabeth Scherer, and William Drieske."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThis case is here presented on a record containing, not an original certificate by the judge of the evidence below, nor a transcript of the whole record below, but a transcript of part, and the original report of the master.\nThere is a stipulation by the attorneys \u201c that the original master\u2019s report and testimony last filed herein, dated May \u2014, 1894, may be incorporated in the record instead of a copy thereof.\u201d\nIn Trustees v. Welchley, 19 Ill. 64, the Supreme Court say, \u201c We can not tolerate such a practice \u201d as that of bringing the original papers of the files of the court below into a court of review.\nThe statute has, since that decision, changed the practice only to the extent that parties \u201cmay, by agreement, have the original bill of exceptions or certificate of evidence, instead of a copy, incorporated in\u201d the transcript.\nTreating, as we do, the master\u2019s report as no part of the record, no cause appears for reversing the decree. (Paraphrased from Trustees v. Welchley, 19 Ill. 64.) The decree is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Francis T. Murphy, attorney for appellants.",
      "Herman B. Wickersham, attorney for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Patrick J. Carey, and John H. Rollins, Trustee, v. Jacob Scherer, Jr., Elizabeth Scherer, and William Drieske.\n1. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Bringing up Original Papers.\u2014 The court will not tolerate the practice of bringing original papers of the files of the court below into a court of review. Under the statute the parties litigant may, by agreement, have the original bill of exceptions or certificate of evidence, instead of a copy, incorporated in the transcript; but that is as far as the practice goes.\n2. Master\u2019s Report\u2014No Part of the Record.\u2014The original master\u2019s report does not become a part of the record because the parties have stipulated that it may be incorporated in the record instead of a copy thereof.\nMemorandum.\u2014In chancery. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1894, and affirmed.\nOpinion filed December 6, 1894.\nFrancis T. Murphy, attorney for appellants.\nHerman B. Wickersham, attorney for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0421-02",
  "first_page_order": 417,
  "last_page_order": 418
}