{
  "id": 5781351,
  "name": "George I.Witney v. Philip R. Bohlen and R. C. Graves",
  "name_abbreviation": "Witney v. Bohlen",
  "decision_date": "1894-12-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "287",
  "last_page": "287",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "56 Ill. App. 287"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "49 Ill. App. 435",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5126133
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/49/0435-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 123,
    "char_count": 1411,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.485,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.7492960360752035e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2978198728960646
    },
    "sha256": "465ee6793bac9e8e7514653b229819514a6bb76745d631f745369bf5df8f8da9",
    "simhash": "1:25b6e9c60c6cce89",
    "word_count": 239
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:04:37.497383+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George I.Witney v. Philip R. Bohlen and R. C. Graves."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Cartwright\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThis case was here on a former appeal, and is reported as Graves, Ex\u2019r, v. Whitney, 49 Ill. App. 435. At that time the order of the Circuit Court overruling the motion of the present appellee to vacate a judgment entered by confession in vacation, was reversed and the cause remanded to that court. The cause was duly reinstated in said court and said motion was sustained and the judgment vacated in accordance with the decision of this court.\nAll the questions involved in this appeal, or raised by appellant in his brief, were passed upon by this court in the former appeal, and the judgment, which accords with the conclusions then reached, will be affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Cartwright"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Fred T. Beers, attorney for appellant.",
      "Otis & Graves, attorneys for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George I.Witney v. Philip R. Bohlen and R. C. Graves.\n1. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Second Appeals upon Determined Questions.\u2014When, on appeal from an order overruling a motion to vacate a judgment, the action of the lower court is reversed, and the cause, upon being remanded, is reinstated in that court, and the motion sustained, such action will be affirmed upon a second appeal, if no other questions are involved.\nMemorandum.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Putnam County; the Hon. Thomas M. Shaw, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1894,\nand affirmed.\nOpinion filed December 13, 1894.\nFred T. Beers, attorney for appellant.\nOtis & Graves, attorneys for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0287-01",
  "first_page_order": 283,
  "last_page_order": 283
}