{
  "id": 856567,
  "name": "Samuel C. Bartlett, William H. Bartlett and Frank P. Frazier v. The Woodbine Savings Bank",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bartlett v. Woodbine Savings Bank",
  "decision_date": "1895-01-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "423",
  "last_page": "425",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "57 Ill. App. 423"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 189,
    "char_count": 2521,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.517,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.061447019797991e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3187983160408194
    },
    "sha256": "3546a606b685cf0faf8e5a05aa80fad47ac07bd78156a157a4802f536048cd6c",
    "simhash": "1:876f98c274ef2c18",
    "word_count": 431
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:02:41.767696+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Samuel C. Bartlett, William H. Bartlett and Frank P. Frazier v. The Woodbine Savings Bank."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThe certificate of the clerk of the Circuit Court to the record filed in this court is that a complete \u201c transcript of the record prepared according to prtecipe filed in my office on the 17th day of August, A. D. 1894.\u201d\nThe praecipe directs the clerk to make up a record \u201c as follows: \u201d\n\u201c Summons and return. (Copy furnished herewith.)\nDeclaration, including amount due. (Copy furnished herewith.)\nBill of exceptions, including motion for a new trial. (Copy furnished.)\nCopy of judgment and copy of appeal bond.\nThe documents referred to as having copies furnished, are inclosed herewith and bound together in such a way that they can be readily taken apart if necessary.\u201d\nIf we assume that the clerk has made up his. transcript from the originals instead of from \u201c copies furnished,\u201d we have no certificate that a transcript of the complete record has been filed in this court.\nThe praecipe does not call for any of the pleadings save the declaration. We are therefore unable to tell what the issues in the cause are. Tolman v. Wheeler, No. 5404, October term 1894 of this court.\nThe statute of June 15, 1887, \u201crecordin case of appeals,\u201d as to presenting to the clerk a copy of the bill of exceptions, etc., affects only the fees to which the clerk is entitled for Inaking a transcript; it does not do away with the necessity for a certificate showing that a complete transcript of the record has been made.\nThe record being insufficient to enable us to enter upon a consideration of the merits of this appeal, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Reed, Brown & Allen, attorneys for appellants.",
      "Monk & Elliott, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Samuel C. Bartlett, William H. Bartlett and Frank P. Frazier v. The Woodbine Savings Bank.\n1. Records\u2014Improper Praecipe and Certificate.\u2014The act approved JunelS, 1887, entitled \u201cAn Act Concerning Fees and Costs,\u201d providing that a party who desires to take an appeal may present to the clerk of the court in which the judgment or decree was rendered a copy of the bill of exceptions or certificate of evidence, affects only the fees to which the clerk is entitled; it does not do away with the necessity for a certificate showing that a complete transcript of the record has been made.\nMemor\u00e1ndum.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker. Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1894, and affirmed for want of a sufficient record.\nOpinion filed January 28, 1895.\nReed, Brown & Allen, attorneys for appellants.\nMonk & Elliott, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0423-01",
  "first_page_order": 419,
  "last_page_order": 421
}