{
  "id": 856594,
  "name": "Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Carl Berg, a Minor, by his Next Friend",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Berg",
  "decision_date": "1895-02-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "521",
  "last_page": "525",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "57 Ill. App. 521"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "119 Ill. 118",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2902174
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/119/0118-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "63 Tex. 435",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Tex.",
      "case_ids": [
        2165432
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/tex/63/0435-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "29 Kan. 98",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Kan.",
      "case_ids": [
        60776
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/kan/29/0098-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "72 Ala. 20",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ala.",
      "case_ids": [
        8491512
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ala/72/0020-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "63 Miss. 1",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Miss.",
      "case_ids": [
        1794637
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/miss/63/0001-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "80 Mo. 307",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Mo.",
      "case_ids": [
        8852161
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/mo/80/0307-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "8 Abb. N. C. 210",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Abb. N. Cas.",
      "case_ids": [
        622823
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/abbn-cas/8/0210-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "50 Cal. 289",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Cal.",
      "case_ids": [
        2318031
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/cal/50/0289-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "78 Ill. 162",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        823938
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/78/0162-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "6 Fla. 721",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Fla.",
      "case_ids": [
        1168119
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/fla/6/0721-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "129 Mass. 598",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Mass.",
      "case_ids": [
        2133375
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/mass/129/0598-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "112 Pa. St. 523",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Pa.",
      "case_ids": [
        546840
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/pa/112/0523-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "23 Fla. 13",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Fla.",
      "case_ids": [
        1120536
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/fla/23/0013-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "86 Ky. 125",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ky.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "74 Me. 489",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Me.",
      "case_ids": [
        8845306
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/me/74/0489-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "50 Iowa 543",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Iowa",
      "case_ids": [
        2326069
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/iowa/50/0543-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "83 Ind. 183",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ind.",
      "case_ids": [
        1319067
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ind/83/0183-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "85 N. C. 34",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11276865
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/85/0034-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "89 Cal. 478",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Cal.",
      "case_ids": [
        287869
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/cal/89/0478-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "43 Minn. 305",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Minn.",
      "case_ids": [
        553140
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/minn/43/0305-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "87 Ill. 185",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5342553
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/87/0185-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "2 How. 263",
      "category": "reporters:scotus_early",
      "reporter": "How.",
      "case_ids": [
        3328542
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/43/0263-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "5 Ired. 12",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ired.",
      "case_ids": [
        11273578
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/27/0012-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "14 Iowa 178",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Iowa",
      "case_ids": [
        2294910
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/iowa/14/0178-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "17 Ark. 100",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8725051
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/17/0100-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "19 Ill. 68",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        441650
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/19/0068-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "8 Oh. St. 201",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ohio St.",
      "case_ids": [
        513437,
        37958
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ohio-st/8/0201-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "25 Conn. 337",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Conn.",
      "case_ids": [
        523363
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/conn/25/0337-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "18 Me. 183",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Me.",
      "case_ids": [
        385040
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/me/18/0183-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 Gray 172",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Gray",
      "case_ids": [
        1996057
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/mass/73/0172-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "8 Pick. 415",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Pick.",
      "case_ids": [
        2013218
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/mass/25/0427-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "24 Wis. 477",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Wis.",
      "case_ids": [
        8709293
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/wis/24/0477-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "65 Ala. 1",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ala.",
      "case_ids": [
        5543332
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ala/65/0001-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "69 Ind. 93",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ind.",
      "case_ids": [
        1933177
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ind/69/0093-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "51 N. J. L. 129",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.J.L.",
      "case_ids": [
        337639
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/njl/51/0129-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "24 Ill. 496",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5283816
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/24/0496-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "48 Wis. 331",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Wis.",
      "case_ids": [
        8705417
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/wis/48/0331-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "88 Ill. 559",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5337112
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/88/0559-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "40 Mich. 196",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Mich.",
      "case_ids": [
        1328423
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/mich/40/0196-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "75 Tex. 644",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Tex.",
      "case_ids": [
        2185006
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/tex/75/0644-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "11 Ill. 57",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2576760
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/11/0057-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "3 McLean 486",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "McLean",
      "case_ids": [
        6125568
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/f-cas/4/0489-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "5 Nott. & McC. 384",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Nott & McC.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 Bush 395",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Bush",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "6 How. 31",
      "category": "reporters:scotus_early",
      "reporter": "How.",
      "case_ids": [
        3349164
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/47/0031-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "12 Ind. 371",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ind.",
      "case_ids": [
        1488951
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ind/12/0371-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "118 Ill. 164",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "46 Ill. App. 325",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5147311
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/46/0325-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "27 Ill. App. 151",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4950858
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/27/0151-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "10 Brad. 50",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Bradf.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "5 Brad. 398",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Bradf.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "149 Ill. 262",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5470880
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/149/0262-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "37 N. E. Rep. 57",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "126 Ill. 242",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5404598
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/126/0242-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "81 Ill. 442",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2673819
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/81/0442-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "72 Ill. 419",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2715607
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/72/0419-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "131 Ill. 505",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5418661
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/131/0505-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "94 Ill. 525",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2727723
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/94/0525-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "89 Ill. 596",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        826377
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/89/0596-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "26 Ill. 186",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5244641
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/26/0186-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "24 Ill. 295",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5284252
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/24/0295-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "43 Ill. App. 525",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5054725
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/43/0525-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 619,
    "char_count": 7598,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.527,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.1225640688263145e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5738674339700887
    },
    "sha256": "cef5d6d285b8490792b36e933726d7a15687e6002b1a084500324bfb9d278f36",
    "simhash": "1:18bc63aa7fe9e689",
    "word_count": 1380
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:02:41.767696+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Carl Berg, a Minor, by his Next Friend."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mb. Justice Gaby\ndelivered the opinion oe the Court.\nThis is a case of horrible injury. Even the photograph of the dismembered appellee which the record contains, arouses the feeling that the railway, by whose machinery he was mangled, should, whether in fault or not,, do what money can do, to mitigate his- misery.\nBut if human testimony is to be weighed with any regard to its value, it is conclusively proved that his most unhappy condition is the result of his boyish inclination, leading him to catch upon the ladder of a passing freight car, from which falling, the wheels passed over him. The evidence fills more than eight hundred pages of the record and any collation of it, however thorough, would only prove what must be accepted on our statement, that we have studied it.\nWe shall therefore reverse the judgment with a finding as a fact, that the injuries of the appellee were occasioned by his own carelessness, and not by any negligence of the appellant.\nSuch a finding is merely an end of this suit; it is a justification for not remanding the cause, but it is no bar to a new suit. This proposition has never been decided in this State, only discussed here in Union National Bank v. Manistee Lumber Co., 43 Ill. App. 525.\nThere is another reason why this case is not remanded; the suit can not be prosecuted. It was once dismissed, and many terms afterward, against the objection and over the exception of the appellant, reinstated.\nWe will not go through the prolix proceedings; simply saying that the court had not jurisdiction to reinstate the suit except by consent of the parties. The judgment is reversed.\nMr. Presiding Justice Waterman.\nMy assent to the reversal of the judgment of the Circuit Court is based entirely upon my conclusion that the court below had, after the expiration of the term at which the cause was dismissed, no authority to reinstate the same.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mb. Justice Gaby Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Appellant\u2019s Brief, Robert Mather, W. H. Stead and Henry S. Waldron, Attorneys.",
      "Appellee\u2019s Brief, Masterson & Haft, Attorneys; Charles E. Pope, of Counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Carl Berg, a Minor, by his Next Friend.\n1. Railroad Companies\u2014Injuries to Minors.\u2014A railroad company is not liable for an injury to a minor, which is solely the result of his boyish inclination, leading him to catch upon the ladder of a passing freight car, from which, falling, the wheels pass over him.\n2. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Reversed, with a Finding of Facts, Not a Bar to Another Suit.\u2014Where a judgment is reversed by the Appellate Court with a finding of facts, it is an end of the suit, and a justification for not remanding the cause; but it is not a bar to the bringing of a new suit for the same cause of action.\n3. Practice\u2014Dismissal for Want of Prosecution\u2014Reinstatement.\u2014 Where a suit is dismissed for want of prosecution, the court has no jurisdiction at a subsequent term to reinstate it, except by consent of the parties.\nMemorandum.\u2014Action for personal injuries. In the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Dunne, Judge, presiding. Declaration in case; plea of not guilty; trial by jury; verdict and judgment for plaintiff; appeal by defendant. Heard in this court at the October term, 1894, and reversed with a finding of facts.\nOpinion filed February 12, 1895.\nAppellant\u2019s Brief, Robert Mather, W. H. Stead and Henry S. Waldron, Attorneys.\nAt a subsequent term, the court has no jurisdiction to vacate or set aside a judgment, or to make any amendment of a substantial character. Cook v. Wood, 24 Ill. 295; Smith v. Wilson, 26 Ill. 186; Becker v. Sauter, 89 Ill. 596; Goucher v. Patterson, 94 Ill. 525; Cook Co. v. Canal & D. Co., 131 Ill. 505.\nTo this rule there is an exception, namely, that the court may, after term, amend its record so as to correct the errors and mistakes of its officers, and so as to make the record conform to the real action and judgment of the court. It is under this exception that the action of the court in this cause seeks its justification. But the exception itself has its qualifications. There must be something certain to amend by, and the \u201c something certain \u201d that is required, it is now settled, is a minute of the judge. Cairo & St. L. R. Co. v. Holbrook, 72 Ill. 419; Church v. English, 81 Ill. 442; Frew v. Danforth, 126 Ill. 242; Ayer v. Chicago, 37 N. E. Rep. 57; 149 Ill. 262; Troutman v. Hill, 5 Brad. 398; Millard v. Cooper, 10 Brad. 50; In re Barnes, 27 Ill. App. 151; Howe v. Warren, 46 Ill. App. 325; Dougherty v. People, 118 Ill. 164.\nAppellee\u2019s Brief, Masterson & Haft, Attorneys; Charles E. Pope, of Counsel.\nThe rule that the record admits of no alteration after the term, is obsolete. In all cases the judgment may be made to conform to the record and instructions to the clerk. Freeman on Judgments, Sec. 71.\nAll courts have inherent power to correct clerical errors at any time. Burson v. Blair, 12 Ind. 371; Bank v. Moss, 6 How. 31; Finnell v. Jones, 7 Bush 395; Paddon v. Bartlett, 5 Nott. & McC. 384; Duvall v. Wells, 4 Her. & McH. 164; Bush v. Robbins, 3 McLean 486; O\u2019Connor v. Mullen, 11 Ill. 57.\nIn the following case, the record has been amended by inserting individuals constituting a partnership, where a firm name only is stated. Wright v. McCampbell, 75 Tex. 644.\nIn the following cases the name of the party has been corrected. Merrick v. Mayhue, 40 Mich. 196; Chandler v. Frost, 88 Ill. 559.\nIn the following case the name of the party omitted from the original record has been inserted. Shoal v. Duprey, 48 Wis. 331.\nIn the following cases the amendment has been made giving the true date of the rendition of the judgment. Burnham v. Chicago, 24 Ill. 496; Hood v. Sparth, 51 N. J. L. 129.\nIn the following case a correction in the computation of the amount due on the note was made. Hughes v. Hinds, 69 Ind. 93.\nIn Taylor v. Howell, 65 Ala. 1, a correction of the description of land was made.\nIn Wisconsin an amendment based on the personal recollection of the judge, and conforming the judgment to that recollection, has been affirmed. Wyman v. Buckstaff, 24 Wis. 477.\nThe practice of hearing evidence on a petition to amend the record is followed in Clark v. Lamb, 8 Pick. 415; Rugg v. Parker, 7 Gray 172; Inhabitants of Limerick, 18 Me. 183; Weed v. Weed, 25 Conn. 337; Hollister v. Judges, 8 Oh. St. 201; Forquer v. Forquer, 19 Ill. 68; Arrington v. Corney, 17 Ark. 100; Stockdall v. Johnson, 14 Iowa 178; Galloway v. McKeithen, 5 Ired. 12; Matson v. Grant, 2 How. 263; see also Freeman on Judgments, par. 100.\nThere is no limit of time within which the amendment may be made. 1 Freeman on Judgments 103; Dunham v. South Park Comm., 87 Ill. 185; McClure v. Bruck, 43 Minn. 305; Krim v. Kessing, 89 Cal. 478; Walton v. Preson, 85 N. C. 34; Sedewer v. Coons, 83 Ind. 183; Whelby v. Smith, 50 Iowa 543; White v. Blake, 74 Me. 489; Seiler v. Bank, 86 Ky. 125.\nWhen an entry is amended it is merely perfected evidence of what, in contemplation of law, existed from the time judgment was pronounced, and for most purposes the judgment will be given effect as if no error or omission had occurred in its original entry. 1 Freeman on Judgments, Sec. 74; Adams v. Wiggins, 23 Fla. 13; Griffiths v. Seers, 112 Pa. St. 523; King v. Burnham, 129 Mass. 598.\nThe entry of judgment nwno pro tuno is always proper when a judgment has been ordered by the court, but the clerk has failed or neglected to copy it in the record. 1 Freeman on Judgments, 161; Hagler v. Mercer, 6 Fla. 721; Howell v. Morlan, 78 Ill. 162; Franklin v. Mendo, 50 Cal. 289; Fulton v. Fulton, 8 Abb. N. C. 210; Hansbrough v. Fudge, 80 Mo. 307; Forbes v. Novra, 63 Miss. 1; Whorley v. R. R., 72 Ala. 20; Adyrlatt v. Brittain, 29 Kan. 98; Whittiker v. Gee, 63 Tex. 435; Reed v. Morton, 119 Ill. 118."
  },
  "file_name": "0521-01",
  "first_page_order": 517,
  "last_page_order": 521
}