{
  "id": 856628,
  "name": "Patrick Phelan and Patrick W. Snowhook v. Mary Cuddy",
  "name_abbreviation": "Phelan v. Cuddy",
  "decision_date": "1895-03-05",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "590",
  "last_page": "591",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "57 Ill. App. 590"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 97,
    "char_count": 992,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.567,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.676830387708631e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3552877021015511
    },
    "sha256": "1ed1f1c09e775c21b66471e9798bee03cc44606850c28f6da2584165844eca11",
    "simhash": "1:325965db0c5498c8",
    "word_count": 163
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:02:41.767696+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Patrick Phelan and Patrick W. Snowhook v. Mary Cuddy."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justioe Shepard\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThe certificate of the clerk to the transcript of the record brought here is, that it is true, perfect and complete, except as to the master\u2019s report, \u201c the original of which being incorporated herein by the stipulation of the parties hereto.\u201d\nThe master\u2019s report is, therefore, no part of the record, and there appears no cause for reversing the decree. Carey v. Scherer, No. 5289, filed December 6, 1894.\nIt will therefore be affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justioe Shepard"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank H. Graham, attorney for appellants.",
      "Weig-ley, Bulkley & Gray, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Patrick Phelan and Patrick W. Snowhook v. Mary Cuddy.\n1. Master\u2019s Report\u2014When Not a Part of the Record.\u2014A master\u2019s report does not become a part of the record by being incorporated therein by stipulation of the parties.\nMemor\u00e1ndum.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Samuel P. McConnell, Judge, presiding. Submitted at the October term, 1894, and affirmed.\nOpinion filed March 5, 1895.\nFrank H. Graham, attorney for appellants.\nWeig-ley, Bulkley & Gray, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0590-01",
  "first_page_order": 586,
  "last_page_order": 587
}