{
  "id": 5087130,
  "name": "Joseph W. Chladek v. Andrew J. Brown",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chladek v. Brown",
  "decision_date": "1895-04-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "379",
  "last_page": "380",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "58 Ill. App. 379"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "28 Ill. 240",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5202778
      ],
      "opinion_index": 1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/28/0240-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 160,
    "char_count": 1919,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.499,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.699485798515691e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4534818439221746
    },
    "sha256": "84f9039b85686bb05bb97c7d65b26470286b32fc9e32e741e5b26893fea53883",
    "simhash": "1:9451c630d2702a9f",
    "word_count": 334
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:52:30.003237+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Joseph W. Chladek v. Andrew J. Brown."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion oe the Court.\nThis is an action upon an appeal bond given in the County Court of Cook County upon an appeal from a judgment of that court to this, in an action of forcible detainer, and conditioned as the statute requires.\nThis case was tried without a jury, and on the trial it appeared that this court affirmed the judgment of the County Court.\nThe Superior Court assessed the damages at $795. The evidence warranted the finding, and we are too much pressed with real questions, to review the argument of the appellant on his thirteen assignments of error.\nThe judgment is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gary"
      },
      {
        "text": "Me. Justice Gary\non petition fob rehearing.\nWe are urged to reconsider the question of the sufficiency of the evidence as to the amount of damages. This we decline to do. We do not regard it to be necessary in deciding that a court or jury made no mistake upon evidence, to recite the evidence.\nIt is further urged that we did not consider the construction of the bond conditioned inter alia to pay \u201c all damages, and loss which plaintiff may sustain by reason of the withholding of the premises, and by reason of any injury done thereto,\u201d As we read the argument the appellant holds that, unless the damages and loss sued for are the result, both of withholding and of injury done, there can be no recovery.\nA statutory bond has the effect which, in reason, must have been intended. Hibbard v. McKinley, 28 Ill. 240.\nPetition denied.",
        "type": "rehearing",
        "author": "Me. Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George G. Bellows, attorney for appellant.",
      "Eastman & Schumacher, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Joseph W. Chladek v. Andrew J. Brown.\n1. Statutory Bonds\u2014Construction of.\u2014A statutory bond has the effect which, in reason, must have been intended by the statute.\nDebt, on an appeal bond. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Henry W. Freeman, Judge, presiding. Submitted at the March term, 1895, of this court.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 22, 1895.\nGeorge G. Bellows, attorney for appellant.\nEastman & Schumacher, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0379-01",
  "first_page_order": 375,
  "last_page_order": 376
}