#### M. C. Jennings v. Oliver H. Horton.

1. Mandamus—Jurisdiction of Appellate Court.—A petition for a mandamus not in aid of any suit pending in this court, must be dismissed.

Mandamus.—Original suit. Heard at the March term, 1895,

and dismissed.

Opinion filed June 27, 1895.

M. C. Jennings, attorney for petitioner.

Otis & Graves, attorneys for respondent.

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a petition for a mandamus, not in aid of any case here pending, but, it may be assumed, in anticipation of some case that may come here, and the brief in support of the petition says: “We unhesitatingly declare that the doctrine announced in * * * Hawes v. People, 124 Ill. 560, is not good law and should not be a guide to this court, in such cases.”

*520As to the first clause or branch of that proposition we are not called upon to express any opinion, as we hold the opposite of the second clause or branch. Fitzpatrick v. C. & W. I. R. R., 31 Ill. App. 649.

The petition is therefore dismissed.