{
  "id": 4744346,
  "name": "Amanda E. Hersey v. Emil C. Schaedel",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hersey v. Schaedel",
  "decision_date": "1880-03-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "188",
  "last_page": "189",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. App. 188"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 196,
    "char_count": 2773,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.541,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.8258001464992802e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7199408150822693
    },
    "sha256": "161377a17e028d957d9e9aaac15100152b1589c0b323cbc57244c7041447490e",
    "simhash": "1:cd73c489d162814c",
    "word_count": 491
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:46:27.659948+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Amanda E. Hersey v. Emil C. Schaedel."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Bailey, P. J.\nThe record in this case contains no bill of exceptions, and although the clerk has recited as a part of the proceedings, that a motion to quash the writ was interposed and overruled, and that an exception to such decision was taken, such matters can be made a part of the record, so as to be subject to review in an appellate court only by bill of exceptions. Van Cott v. Sprague, 5 Brad well, 99.\nBut there is another insuperable obstacle in the way of our entertaining jurisdiction of this cause or considering the error assigned, growing out of the fact that no final judgment has been rendered by the court below. This court can only review final orders, judgments and decrees of the circuit court. The order denying the motion to quash the writ of certiorari did not finally dispose of the case, nor did it constitute a final determination of any of the rights of the parties litigant. It merely retained the cause for trial de novo, and until such trial is had, resulting in a final judgment, or the cause is otherwise finally disposed of, it cannot be brought to this court by appeal or writ of error. Benevolent Association of Paid Fire Department, etc., v. Farwell, 5 Bradwell, 240; Village of Jefferson v. Bohemian National Cemetery Association, Id. 230. The writ of error will therefore be dismissed, at the costs of the plaintiff in error.\nWrit of error dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Bailey, P. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. William B. Bradford, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Hr. John C. Bichberg, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Amanda E. Hersey v. Emil C. Schaedel.\n1. Practice \u2014 Bill of exceptions. \u2014 The action of the court in overruling a motion to quash a writ of certiorari can only be brought to the notice of this court by a bill of exceptions. Recitals by the clerk in the record are not suEcient.\n2. Appeal \u2014 Only from final judgments. \u2014 This court can only review final orders, judgments and decrees of the court below. The overruling of a motion to quash a writ of certiorari is not such a final disposition of the case as may be appealed from.\nError to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas A. Moran, Judge, presiding.\nOpinion filed March 29, 1880.\nThis suit was commenced by Amanda E. Hersey against Emil C. Schaedel, before a justice of the peace of Cook county, where the plaintiff recovered a judgment for $160 and costs. On petition of the defendant, a writ of certiorari was issued to remove said cause into the circuit court, and thereupon the plaintiff moved to quash said writ, on the ground of the insufficiency of the defendant\u2019s petition therefor. This motion being overruled, no further proceedings were had in the court below, and the cause is brought to this court by writ of error. The only error assigned is, the decision denying the motion to quash the writ of certiorari.\nMr. William B. Bradford, for plaintiff in error.\nHr. John C. Bichberg, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0188-01",
  "first_page_order": 186,
  "last_page_order": 187
}
