{
  "id": 4747136,
  "name": "Ruth A. Conklin v. M. A. Burdick",
  "name_abbreviation": "Conklin v. Burdick",
  "decision_date": "1880-04-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "153",
  "last_page": "154",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. App. 153"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 89,
    "char_count": 817,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.509,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.8591662004228935e-08,
      "percentile": 0.36622694991097937
    },
    "sha256": "ea85f07654b697fff323b862260905c4d28d4c6f9f65655d89180bd1c68442d2",
    "simhash": "1:8274d69d19ad8728",
    "word_count": 138
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:46:27.659948+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ruth A. Conklin v. M. A. Burdick."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThere can be no question that several erroneous instructions were given to the jury on the the trial of this cause. We think, however, upon a careful examination of all the evidence in the record, substantial justice was done by the verdict of the jury, and that a different verdict could not, under the evidence, have been permitted to stand.\nThe judgment is therefore affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. J. H. Yager, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Mr. Alexander W. Hope, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ruth A. Conklin v. M. A. Burdick.\nError will rot always reverse. \u2014 Although several erroneous instructions were given, yet this court is of opinion that substantial justice has been done, and affirms the judgment.'\nError to the City Court of Alton; the Hon. H. S. Baber, Judge, presiding.\nOpinion filed April 2, 1880.\nMr. J. H. Yager, for plaintiff in error.\nMr. Alexander W. Hope, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0153-01",
  "first_page_order": 151,
  "last_page_order": 152
}