{
  "id": 4744224,
  "name": "James M. Hunter v. Ella B. Hunter",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hunter v. Hunter",
  "decision_date": "1880-06-18",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "459",
  "last_page": "460",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. App. 459"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 153,
    "char_count": 1693,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.51,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.138363859351185e-08,
      "percentile": 0.47219644851881326
    },
    "sha256": "da9cf4545fb2a922dad37e321a60fc34ddd3ba746c48ba4462d0e03f1a8fc105",
    "simhash": "1:3cd644bcff9baac0",
    "word_count": 297
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:46:27.659948+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James M. Hunter v. Ella B. Hunter."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis is an appeal by the defendant below from a decree for separate maintenance.\nAppellee here presents her petition for an allowance for solicitor\u2019s fees for services to be rendered in defending against, said appeal.\nThe statute on the subject provides that \u201c the court may grant allowance to enable the wife to prosecute her suit, as in cases of divorce \u201d (Laws of 1877, p. 115); and the provision in the Divorce Act is that \u201c in case of appeal or writ of error by the husband, the court in which the decree or order is. rendered may grant and enforce the payment of such money for her defense as to such court shall seem reasonable and proper: R. S. 1877, p. 415, \u00a7 15.\nThis court can exercise \u201c appellate jurisdiction only,\u201d with \u201c all power and authority necessary to carry into complete execution all its judgments, decrees and determinations in all matters within its jurisdiction, according to the rules and principles of the common law and of the law of this State:\u201d R. S. 1877, p. 323, \u00a7\u00a7 25-26.\nWe are of opinion that to grant the order here prayed for is not within the jurisdiction or power so conferred. The petition will therefore be denied.\nPetition denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hr. J. FT. Ore, for appellant.",
      "Hr. C. B. Starr, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James M. Hunter v. Ella B. Hunter.\nSep abate maintenance \u2014 Allowance of solicitob\u2019s fees on appeal. \u2014This court has no power to make an order upon appellant to pay the wife, complainant in a bill for separate maintenance, a sum as solicitor\u2019s fees, to enable her to defend the case on appeal to this court by her husband.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Kankakee county; the Hon. Franklin Blades, Judge, presiding.\nOpinion filed June 18, 1880.\nHr. J. FT. Ore, for appellant.\nHr. C. B. Starr, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0459-01",
  "first_page_order": 457,
  "last_page_order": 458
}