{
  "id": 5157518,
  "name": "Angie Traeger v. The Mutual Building and loan Association and Samuel T. White, Impleaded with Darius J. Morey, Ellen A. Martin and George Oliver, Trustees",
  "name_abbreviation": "Traeger v. Mutual Building & loan Ass'n",
  "decision_date": "1895-10-31",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "443",
  "last_page": "444",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "60 Ill. App. 443"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "23 Ill. App. 453",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        863714
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/23/0453-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "58 Ill. App. 238",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "58 Ill. App. 419",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5081233
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/58/0419-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "3 Gilm. 2",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Gilm.",
      "case_ids": [
        2463280
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/8/0002-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "116 Ill. 216",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2886042
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/116/0216-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 178,
    "char_count": 1997,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.5,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.8591662004228935e-08,
      "percentile": 0.36621208417942513
    },
    "sha256": "ef451dfe3ea06b7ef29db2e897c06b7a685a6bf5b8e59b68b9c717ef1d536b39",
    "simhash": "1:5d46ce0290355688",
    "word_count": 352
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:22:36.351146+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Angie Traeger v. The Mutual Building and loan Association and Samuel T. White, Impleaded with Darius J. Morey, Ellen A. Martin and George Oliver, Trustees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThe abstract of the plaintiff in error entitled the bill she filed, \u201c Bill of Beview and Supplement.\u201d There is no claim of newly discovered evidence, and the review, if any, is to be \u2014must be, for error apparent on the record of the former case. Ebert v. Gerding, 116 Ill. 216; and therefore that whole record must be inspected. Griggs v. Gear, 3 Gilm. 2.\nThe abstract filed contains no copies or abridgments of any part of that record, but only points us to places in the record here filed where such copies may be found. Such places constituting, as shown by side paging of the abstract, more than one hundred pages of the record here.\nUpon such an abstract we can not review the action of the Superior Court, and the decree dismissing the bill must be affirmed. Wabash R. R. v. Smith, 58 Ill. App. 419; Vocke v. Peters, 58 Ill. App. 238; Hepp v. Jaenemann, 23 Ill. App. 453.\nProm the abstract we can learn nothing of the original case. Affirmed.\nShepard, J., takes no part in this decision.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "\u00a1Matthews & Hughes, attorneys for plaintiff in error.",
      "TVT. L. Baftree, attorney for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Angie Traeger v. The Mutual Building and loan Association and Samuel T. White, Impleaded with Darius J. Morey, Ellen A. Martin and George Oliver, Trustees.\n1. Bills of Review\u2014When to be Brought.\u2014A bill of review can only be brought upon error in law appearing upon the face of the decree without further examination of matters of fact, or upon new matter which has been discovered siiice the decree.\n2. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Abstracts\u2014Upon an abstract containing no copies or abridgments of any part of the record, but pointing only to places in the record where the same may be found, the action of the court below can not be reviewed.\nBill of Review.\u2014Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 31, 1895.\n\u00a1Matthews & Hughes, attorneys for plaintiff in error.\nTVT. L. Baftree, attorney for defendants in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0443-01",
  "first_page_order": 441,
  "last_page_order": 442
}