{
  "id": 5155805,
  "name": "Patrick McGuiness v. Annie McGuiness",
  "name_abbreviation": "McGuiness v. McGuiness",
  "decision_date": "1895-12-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "563",
  "last_page": "563",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "60 Ill. App. 563"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "132 Ill. 112",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5420427
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/132/0112-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "59 Ill. App. 434",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5150799
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/59/0434-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "51 Ill. App. 415",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 157,
    "char_count": 1740,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.457,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15583360265405435
    },
    "sha256": "dc731270001cbd4712b2fd8bbd9797e03a5692a34eb5987d8dcc70f446976062",
    "simhash": "1:58cf7c0476793238",
    "word_count": 283
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:22:36.351146+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Patrick McGuiness v. Annie McGuiness."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Waterman\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThis was an application to reduce the amount awarded appellee by a former decree as an allowance for separate maintenance, it being alleged that the circumstances of both parties had, since the entry of such former decree, so changed as to make the allowance now inequitable.\nThe cause being referred to a master, he took testimony, and reported that the allowance should be reduced from \u00a735 to \u00a727.50 per month. Each party excepted to the report. The court sustained appellee\u2019s exceptions, and overruled appellant\u2019s.\nWe have examined the record, and find that the exceptions of appellant to the report of the master were of a general nature and failed to point out the evidence upon which appellant relied. They were, for this reason, properly overruled. Wolcott v. Lake View B. & L. Ass\u2019n, 51 Ill. App. 415; Springer v. Kroesohell, 59 Ill. App. 434.\nAppellee\u2019s exceptions were as faulty.\nThe Supreme Court of this State hold that an appellate court will not reverse a decree because insufficient exceptions to a master\u2019s report were sustained. Farwell et al. v. Huling, 132 Ill. 112.\nThe decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Waterman"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Q-. M\u201e Miller, attorney for appellant.",
      "Dale & Frang\u00eds, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Patrick McGuiness v. Annie McGuiness.\n1. Equity ~PRA.cn.aE\u2014Insufficient Exceptions to Master's Report.\u2014Exceptions to a master\u2019s report, which are of a general nature, and which fail to point out the evidence upon which the party excepting relies, are properly overruled.\nSeparate Maintenance.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 2, 1895.\nQ-. M\u201e Miller, attorney for appellant.\nDale & Frang\u00eds, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0563-01",
  "first_page_order": 561,
  "last_page_order": 561
}