{
  "id": 5164661,
  "name": "Frank H. Novak v. Wadsworth Howland Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Novak v. Wadsworth Howland Co.",
  "decision_date": "1895-12-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "303",
  "last_page": "304",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "61 Ill. App. 303"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1156,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.52,
    "sha256": "ef0d8e67066ad3e11196715668a0afe028b4e67482ba1b2f029e87f88eb80922",
    "simhash": "1:91ed7ef8ccb8b2e8",
    "word_count": 184
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:50:02.966731+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Frank H. Novak v. Wadsworth Howland Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Waterman\ndelivebed the opinion oe the Coubt.\nIn a garnishee proceeding in the Circuit Court, appellant appeared as an interpleader, claiming that the indebtedness to Isaac Levy, the subject-matter of the garnishee proceedings, had been assigned to him, appellant. Upon this claim of appellant a trial was had with a result adverse to him.\nWe find ourselves unable to enter upon a consideration of the merits of this case because the record does not contain the assignment under which appellant claims, nor any evidence showing what the written agreement of assignment was.\nThe judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Waterman"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Blum & Blum, attorneys for appellant.",
      "Charles Lane, attorney for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Frank H. Novak v. Wadsworth Howland Co.\n1. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Defective Record.\u2014The Appellate Court can not enter upon a consideration of the merits of a case where the record does not contain the evidence under which the appellant claims.\nGarnishee Proceedings.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1895.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 12, 1895.\nBlum & Blum, attorneys for appellant.\nCharles Lane, attorney for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0303-01",
  "first_page_order": 301,
  "last_page_order": 302
}