{
  "id": 869025,
  "name": "Jonathan R. McDole v. Mary E. Kingsley et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "McDole v. Kingsley",
  "decision_date": "1895-12-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "30",
  "last_page": "30",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "62 Ill. App. 30"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "149 Ill. 403",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5471577
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/149/0403-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1513,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.483,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.030606031471332885
    },
    "sha256": "15bfb3777043591615a1e731955315c821a9dee86f25e4f1ee2130292ada65a4",
    "simhash": "1:f4d0e67d509b7997",
    "word_count": 268
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:10:11.174453+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Jonathan R. McDole v. Mary E. Kingsley et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nDefendants in error have filed a motion to quash the writ and dismiss the cause for want of jurisdiction in this court.\nThe ground of the motion is that a freehold is involved.\nThis is a bill for specific performance, in which the complainant seeks to compel the execution and delivery to him of a good and sufficient deed, conveying the title to 230 acres of land in pursuance of an alleged parol agreement between himself and his deceased father, Rodney McDole.\nUnder the holding of our Supreme Court in Hayes v. O\u2019Brien et al., 149 Ill. 403, we must hold that a freehold is involved and that this court has no jurisdiction.\nThe writ of error is therefore quashed and the cause dismissed, with leave to withdraw the record.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "A. C. Little, R. G. Montony and G. W. Avery, attorneys for plaintiff in error.",
      "A. J. Hopkins, F. H. Thatcher and F. A. Dolph, attorneys for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Jonathan R. McDole v. Mary E. Kingsley et al.\n1. Freehold\u2014Involved in a Suit for Specific Performance.\u2014A freehold is involved in a suit for specific performance in which the complainant seeks to compel the execution and delivery to him of a good and sufficient deed conveying the title to lands in pursuance of an alleged parol agreement.\nBill for Specific Performance.\u2014Error to the Circuit Court of Kane County; the Hon. Henry B. Willis, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court on a motion to quash the writ because a freehold is involved.\nMotion allowed and writ of error quashed.\nOpinion filed December 13, 1895.\nA. C. Little, R. G. Montony and G. W. Avery, attorneys for plaintiff in error.\nA. J. Hopkins, F. H. Thatcher and F. A. Dolph, attorneys for defendants in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0030-01",
  "first_page_order": 26,
  "last_page_order": 26
}