{
  "id": 869087,
  "name": "Orr & Lockett Hardware Co. v. Needham Co. et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Orr & Lockett Hardware Co. v. Needham Co.",
  "decision_date": "1896-01-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "152",
  "last_page": "154",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "62 Ill. App. 152"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "58 Ill. App. 417",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5081282
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/58/0417-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "51 Ill. App. 57",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5113500
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/51/0057-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "145 Ill. 389",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5484866
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/145/0389-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "134 Ill. 126",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5437430
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/134/0126-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "35 Ill. App. 71",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5005977
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/35/0071-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "41 Ill. App. 349",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5034327
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/41/0349-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 253,
    "char_count": 4027,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.529,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.138363859351185e-08,
      "percentile": 0.46958780222321844
    },
    "sha256": "65d3d5432a2d348df9e8a2df218b7c3a792e10d78449ee35a0c8bb582594ab2a",
    "simhash": "1:73ac1db6bc3cba12",
    "word_count": 678
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:10:11.174453+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Orr & Lockett Hardware Co. v. Needham Co. et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Waterman\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThis was a petition for a mechanic\u2019s lien.\nThe account filed with the clerk of the Circuit Court, and the verification thereof, were as follows:\n\u201c State of Illinois, \\ County of Cook, j\nIn the Circuit Court of said county.\nWilliam H. Edwards, secretary of the Orr & Lockett Hardware Company, a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of Illinois, for and on behalf of said corporation, dealers in builders\u2019 hardware, etc., makes the following as a true and just statement of account due it, after allowing; all credits and set-offs for builders\u2019 hardware furnished by the said Orr & Lockett Hardware Company, and the said company by William II. Edwards, its secretary, hereby states that the itemized account hereto attached and made a part hereof, truly and correctly sets forth the materials, consisting of builders\u2019 hardware so furnished and the dates when furnished, and that there is now due the said Orr & Lockett Hardware Company, on account of said builders\u2019 hardware so furnished as aforesaid and used in and upon the real estate and buildings hereinafter described, the sum or $613.60.\nThe following is a correct description of the real estate and buildings and property to be charged with the lien provided for by the statute, and the names of the owners thereof, to wit: * *\u25a0 *\nOrr & Lockett Hardware Compart,\nBy William H. Edwards, Secretary.\nState of Illinois, ) County of Cook, j '\nWilliam II. Edwards, being first duly sworn, on oath says that the above and foregoing statement of account by him subscribed, contains a full and true statement of builders\u2019 hardware furnished by the said Orr & Lockett Hardware Company, for and were used in and upon the lots, real estate and buildings therein described, and that there is due and unpaid for, on account thereof, to said Orr & Lockett Hardware Company the sum of $613.60.\nWilliam H. Edwards.\nSubscribed and sworn to before me this 21st day of July, A. D. 1890.\nW. A. Phelps,\nJS\u00cd otary Public.\nThe statute, Sec. 4, of Chap. 82, R. S., as amended by act in force July 1, 1887, makes it incumbent that there be filed a just and true statement, verified by affidavit, setting forth, among other things, the times when \u201c such material was furnished or labor performed.\u201d\nThe verification of the account by appellant fails to set forth that the statement of account is true, in respect to the time or times when the material was furnished; the affidavit in this regard is only that the statement of account \u201c contains a full and true statement of builders\u2019 hardware furnished,\u201d etc. This is not in compliance with the statute. Beck Lumber Co. v. Halsey, 41 Ill. App. 349; McDonald v. Rosengarten, 35 Ill. App. 71; McDonald v. Rosengarten, 134 Ill. 126; Campbell v. Jacobson, 145 Ill. 389.\nThe opinion of this court set forth in Orr & Lockett Hardware Co. v. Needham Co. et al., 51 Ill. App. 57, as to the necessity for filing such account when the proceeding is against the owner only, has been disapproved, and the rule announced that Sec. 4 of the statute applies to proceedings against owners as well as others. Campbell v. Jacobson, 145 Ill. 389; Brady v. Pearson Lumber Co., 58 Ill. App. 417.\nThe decree of the Circuit Court, dismissing the petition, is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Waterman"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "H. C. Bennett and W. A. Phelps, attorneys for appellant.",
      "Hiram Holbrook Rose, attorney for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Orr & Lockett Hardware Co. v. Needham Co. et al.\n1. Mechanics\u2019 Liens\u2014Requisites of the Statement.\u2014Section 4 of chapter 82, R. S., entitled \u201c Liens,\u201d as amended by the act in force July 1, 1887, requires that there be filed a just and true statement, verified by affidavit, setting forth, among other things, the times when the material was furnished or labor performed. A statement lacking in these essentials is insufficient.\nMechanics\u2019 Liens.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 22, 1896.\nH. C. Bennett and W. A. Phelps, attorneys for appellant.\nHiram Holbrook Rose, attorney for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0152-01",
  "first_page_order": 148,
  "last_page_order": 150
}