{
  "id": 869050,
  "name": "Dainton & Co. v. George W. Bennett and James H. Gilbert",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dainton & Co. v. Bennett",
  "decision_date": "1896-01-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "301",
  "last_page": "302",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "62 Ill. App. 301"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 1065,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.511,
    "sha256": "55aba55770f0d8abf1d6bc4d5c61c399925064934082eccd5e4af9813ff88ed7",
    "simhash": "1:138f4daefc85005a",
    "word_count": 180
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:10:11.174453+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Dainton & Co. v. George W. Bennett and James H. Gilbert."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Waterman\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThis was an action of replevin, the contest being as to the right to the possession of a stock of groceries, etc.\nOnly a question of fact was presented. The dispute was as to whether George W. Bennett had delivered possession of the goods to Messrs. Saddler & Orr, to whom he had made a sale; the contest was not, as appellant argues, whether he retained a lien upon goods with the possession of which he had parted. As to whether appellee had given possession of the goods the evidence was contradictory, and the verdict of the jury justifiable.\nThe judgment of the Circuit Court is therefore affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Waterman"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "L. H. Bisbbe & W. H. Gemmill, attorneys for appellant.",
      "Ho appearance for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Dainton & Co. v. George W. Bennett and James H. Gilbert.\n1. Verdicts\u2014When Conclusive.\u2014A verdict on conflicting evidence is conclusive.\nReplevin.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 22, 1896.\nL. H. Bisbbe & W. H. Gemmill, attorneys for appellant.\nHo appearance for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0301-01",
  "first_page_order": 297,
  "last_page_order": 298
}