{
  "id": 5171983,
  "name": "Berthold Reis and Mayer Guettel v. Manaseha Pitzele et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Reis v. Pitzele",
  "decision_date": "1896-03-03",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "47",
  "last_page": "47",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "63 Ill. App. 47"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "35 Ill. App. 448",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5006760
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/35/0448-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "126 Ill. 496",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5403927
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/126/0496-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 143,
    "char_count": 1522,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.544,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.8591662004228935e-08,
      "percentile": 0.36621555928550276
    },
    "sha256": "6d2cda7c8ab8ee042a303b759621a537d69c950e05c949999bfa3f523e44ae4d",
    "simhash": "1:c92b3785a8fa8ae5",
    "word_count": 253
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:54:49.987215+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Berthold Reis and Mayer Guettel v. Manaseha Pitzele et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nTo the original record, filed here October 2, 1895, the clerk of the Circuit Court certified that it was a complete transcript \u201c so far as pertains to the cross-bill \u201d in a certain chancery cause\u2014of which he gave the title\u2014lately pending in that court.\nWe can not reverse a decree upon such certificate. Village of Melrose v. Bernard, 126 Ill. 496.\nNovember 29, 1895, more record was here filed, which the clerk of the Circuit Court certified, is a \u201c complete copy of a certain bill of complaint filed \u201d in the same cause.\nThat does not help. Atkinson v. Linden Steel Co., 35 Ill. App. 448.\nThose cases, or this opinion, would have no greater weight by copying from them.\nThe decree is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Cratty Bros., MacLaren, Jarvis & Cleveland, attorneys for appellants.",
      "Moses, Pam & Kennedy, attorneys for appellees.",
      "Defrees, Brace & Ritter, attorneys for William Kratzenburg."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Berthold Reis and Mayer Guettel v. Manaseha Pitzele et al.\n1. Records \u2014Insufficiently Certified.\u2014A certificate of the clerk of the trial court, stating that \u201c the above and foregoing is a true, perfect and complete transcript of the record so far as pertains to the cross-bill, in a certain cause lately pending in said court, on the chancery side thereof, between,\u201d etc., is not sufficient.\nBill in Chancery.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 3, 1896.\nCratty Bros., MacLaren, Jarvis & Cleveland, attorneys for appellants.\nMoses, Pam & Kennedy, attorneys for appellees.\nDefrees, Brace & Ritter, attorneys for William Kratzenburg."
  },
  "file_name": "0047-01",
  "first_page_order": 43,
  "last_page_order": 43
}