{
  "id": 5170520,
  "name": "Adams & Sons Co. v. Morris H. Ellinger",
  "name_abbreviation": "Adams & Sons Co. v. Ellinger",
  "decision_date": "1896-04-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "479",
  "last_page": "479",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "63 Ill. App. 479"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1336,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.492,
    "sha256": "cec72c112282eba366327f552ead0f1818b73ff0c8eef9e6f7eb4b4a86c02c37",
    "simhash": "1:36c207e5804d2719",
    "word_count": 229
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:54:49.987215+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Adams & Sons Co. v. Morris H. Ellinger."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThe abstract of the appellant labels this case as appeal, and itself\u2014a corporation\u2014plaintiff in error; does not show that any judgment was ever entered, or any bill of exceptions made. If upon such an abstract we went into the merits so far as they were shown, it would appear that the appellant promised to pay the appellee one thousand dollars for doing what he did do, and when it was done, would not pay anything.\nIn such a case, the judgment\u2014if there be one, as the briefs assume\u2014should be affirmed, and it is accordingly done.\n' Ho fault can be found in the instructions which the abstract says were given for the appellee, and all that the appellant asked were given, except one\u2014to find for the defendant.\nThe case was fully proved, and the result was right. Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Byam & Weinschenk, attorneys for appellant.",
      "Zach. Hofheimer, attorney for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Adams & Sons Co. v. Morris H. Ellinger.\n1. Abstracts\u2014When Insufficient, Judgment Affirmed.\u2014Where the abstract fails to show that any judgment was entered, or bill of exceptions made, the judgment will be affirmed.\nAssumpsit, for money due. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Francis Adams, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1896.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 13, 1896.\nByam & Weinschenk, attorneys for appellant.\nZach. Hofheimer, attorney for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0479-01",
  "first_page_order": 475,
  "last_page_order": 475
}