{
  "id": 5167597,
  "name": "First National Bank, for the use of, etc., v. Lake Erie and W. R. R. Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "First National Bank v. Lake Erie & W. R. R. Co.",
  "decision_date": "1895-12-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "576",
  "last_page": "577",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "63 Ill. App. 576"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "127 Ill. 253",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5411311
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/127/0253-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "74 Ill. 110",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "38 Ill. 197",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        428276
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/38/0197-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "17 Ill. 238",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2591200
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/17/0238-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "113 Ill. 654",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2865088
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/113/0654-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 168,
    "char_count": 1688,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.551,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15594345461839668
    },
    "sha256": "0d9fe9f612a89b262c3b2ca298175101fa889c798aba1abf9aa9e66858f73a79",
    "simhash": "1:3d565f20c8871ed4",
    "word_count": 296
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:54:49.987215+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "First National Bank, for the use of, etc., v. Lake Erie and W. R. R. Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion\nper Curiam.\nAppellant entered a motion in the trial court for retaxation of certain items of cost, taxed in an action at law, and by this appeal seeks to bring before us for review the action of the court upon its motion.\nThe bill of exceptions contains the evidence, but nothing more. It does not appear, therefore, that the court made any ruling, finding or decision whatever, or that exception or objection of any nature or kind was interposed.\nThe mode of assigning error in actions at law is regulated by statute, and the right can be exercised only where the decision or ruling sought to be brought before the court for review was excepted to in the trial court. Secs. 61 and 62, Chap. 110, R. S., entitled \u201cPractice ;\u201d James v. Dexter, 113 Ill. 654.\nExceptions can only be taken and preserved by a bill of exceptions signed and sealed by the judge. The clerk is without power to certify thereto. James v. Dexter, supra.\nWe are precluded from reversing the alleged errors. Parson v. Evans, 17 Ill. 238; Daniel v. Shields, 38 Ill. 197; Force Manf. Co. v. Horton, 74 Ill. 110; James v. Dexter, supra; Nat. Bank v. LaMoyne, 127 Ill. 253.\nThe judgment must be affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "D. J. Schuyler and C. W. Greenfield, attorneys for appellant.",
      "H. M. Steely, attorney for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "First National Bank, for the use of, etc., v. Lake Erie and W. R. R. Co.\n1. Exceptions\u2014iloio Preserved.\u2014Exceptions can only he preserved by a bill of exceptions properly signed and sealed by the judge.\nRelaxation of Costs.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion County; the Hon. Ferdinand Bookwalter, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1895.\nAffirmed,\nOpinion filed December 21, 1895.\nD. J. Schuyler and C. W. Greenfield, attorneys for appellant.\nH. M. Steely, attorney for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0576-01",
  "first_page_order": 572,
  "last_page_order": 573
}