{
  "id": 5173412,
  "name": "William R. Hartley v. George J. Atkins, George E. Milligan, Ophir Mining Company and American Development Company",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hartley v. Atkins",
  "decision_date": "1896-06-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "502",
  "last_page": "502",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "64 Ill. App. 502"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "63 Ill. App. 313",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5169863
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/63/0313-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 124,
    "char_count": 1278,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.521,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15599963549998475
    },
    "sha256": "0a56a4d75d2e1eb886f00af24a9dc9a86f403f63ff20214c488263ef2d3bf4cb",
    "simhash": "1:5bcf6763f42981a5",
    "word_count": 213
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:36.948645+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William R. Hartley v. George J. Atkins, George E. Milligan, Ophir Mining Company and American Development Company."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion, of the Court.\nThe appellant filed a judgment creditor\u2019s bill based upon the return of an execution, which return is as follows:\n\u201c The within named defendant and no property of the within named defendant found in my county upon which to levy this writ. I therefore return the same, no property found and no part satisfied, this 25th day of March, A. ID. 1895, by order of plaintiff\u2019s attorney.\nJames Pease, Sheriff,\nby J. A. McCartney, Deputy.\u201d\nThe opinion of Judge Shepard in Pecos Irrigation Co. v. Olson, 63 Ill. App. 313, leaves nothing for me to say in this case, except that the decree dismissing the bill is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Alfred P. Williams and C. M. Failing, attorneys for appellant.",
      "Charles F. Morse, attorney for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William R. Hartley v. George J. Atkins, George E. Milligan, Ophir Mining Company and American Development Company.\n1. Creditor's Bill\u2014Requisites of the Sheriff\u2019s Return.\u2014An officer\u2019s return to an execution by order of the plaintiff\u2019s attorneys is not a sufficient return upon which to base a creditor\u2019s bill.\nCreditor\u2019s Bill.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1896.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 1, 1896.\nAlfred P. Williams and C. M. Failing, attorneys for appellant.\nCharles F. Morse, attorney for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0502-01",
  "first_page_order": 500,
  "last_page_order": 500
}
