{
  "id": 5173057,
  "name": "Potter Palmer et al. v. Union Elevated R. R. Co.; Erskine M. Phelps et al. v. Union Elevated R. R. Co.; Columbus R. Cummings et al. v. Union Elevated R. R. Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Palmer v. Union Elevated R. R. Co.",
  "decision_date": "1896-03-31",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "534",
  "last_page": "534",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "64 Ill. App. 534"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "60 Ill. App. 471",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5154399
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/60/0471-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "60 Ill. App. 471",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5154399
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/60/0471-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 93,
    "char_count": 944,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.582,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3608438240779088e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6361969365781557
    },
    "sha256": "1613f4001bfc0338b9b0dd4d353785b59471b2538c4c3a271de971cfb674d7ce",
    "simhash": "1:b0035bd9447d64e0",
    "word_count": 159
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:36.948645+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Potter Palmer et al. v. Union Elevated R. R. Co. Erskine M. Phelps et al. v. Union Elevated R. R. Co. Columbus R. Cummings et al. v. Union Elevated R. R. Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court. '\nThe question in these cases was fully considered at the last term, upon appeals from interlocutory orders granting injunctions. For the reasons there assigned, the present decrees dismissing the bills are affirmed. Phelps v. Lake Street Elevated R. R. Co. is the head title under .which five cases are reported, 60 Ill. App. 471.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Green, Robbins & Honore, attorneys for appellants.",
      "Wilson, Moore & McIlvane, attorneys for appellee.-"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Potter Palmer et al. v. Union Elevated R. R. Co. Erskine M. Phelps et al. v. Union Elevated R. R. Co. Columbus R. Cummings et al. v. Union Elevated R. R. Co.\n1. Memorandum.\u2014See Phelps v. Lake Street Elevated R. R. Co., 60 Ill. App. 471.\nBill for Injunction.\u2014Appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1896.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 31, 1896.\nGreen, Robbins & Honore, attorneys for appellants.\nWilson, Moore & McIlvane, attorneys for appellee.-"
  },
  "file_name": "0534-01",
  "first_page_order": 532,
  "last_page_order": 532
}
