{
  "id": 5172201,
  "name": "John F. Neagle v. Henry G. Dawson et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Neagle v. Dawson",
  "decision_date": "1896-03-31",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "538",
  "last_page": "539",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "64 Ill. App. 538"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "97 Ill. 620",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2842683
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/97/0620-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 100,
    "char_count": 1186,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.522,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.682524327565528e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4529401134969645
    },
    "sha256": "4cd43e4285015a151ff09567dd71cbd1ee796419a17a72ac52924cd5d39c3f13",
    "simhash": "1:1546c7f9aa0606ca",
    "word_count": 205
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:36.948645+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John F. Neagle v. Henry G. Dawson et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nOh the first day of this term the appellant dismissed this appeal.\nThe appellees now ask damages. Sections 23 and 24, Chapter 33, \u201cCosts,\u201d and Section 74, Chapter 110, \u201cPractice,\u201d entitle the appellees to damages.\nThe dismissal of the appeal is an affirmance of the judgment of the Superior Court, for the purpose of giving damages for delay, as well as for remedy upon the appeal bond. Garrick v. Chamberlain, 97 Ill. 620.\nDamages are awarded\u2014ten per cent on the first $100, and five per cent on the residue\u2014as the appeal appears to have been only for delay.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank P. Reynolds, attorney for appellant.",
      "Weigley & Eastman, attorneys for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John F. Neagle v. Henry G. Dawson et al.\n1. Practice\u2014Affirmance\u2014Damages for Delay.\u2014A dismissal of an appeal is an affirmance of the judgment for the purpose of giving damages for delay, as well as a remedy upon the appeal bond.\nAssessment of Damages, upon dismissal of appeal. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Henry V. Freeman, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1896.\nDamages assessed in this court.\nOpinion filed March 31, 1896.\nFrank P. Reynolds, attorney for appellant.\nWeigley & Eastman, attorneys for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0538-01",
  "first_page_order": 536,
  "last_page_order": 537
}
