{
  "id": 5174855,
  "name": "County of Madison v. William H. Halliburton",
  "name_abbreviation": "County of Madison v. Halliburton",
  "decision_date": "1895-12-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "99",
  "last_page": "99",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "64 Ill. App. 99"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 157,
    "char_count": 1674,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.501,
    "sha256": "9d018967f67cb69184b6ee5780fc6d5f230a7b058f51528e6525155a4a75e5bd",
    "simhash": "1:5626ebd2dca932a8",
    "word_count": 279
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:36.948645+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "County of Madison v. William H. Halliburton."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Pleasants\ndelivered the opinion op the Court.\nThis is a companion case to that of the same appellant vs. William A. Haskell, in which an opinion has been filed. The only difference between them claimed to affect the question of appellant\u2019s liability is that at the time of the Wann disaster, and during all the time of treatment of the victims in the hospital, appellee was the county physician at an annual salary which was duly paid. He testified, however, that his contract, which was verbal, covered the cases of the county \u201c poor\u201d only; that he so claimed to the supervisors of the two townships, who concurred in his understanding that it did not embrace those here in question, and we think the court was fully warranted by the evidence in so finding.\nAppellant furnished no materials, and therefore the judgment was for $532.60, being less than Dr. Haskell\u2019s by just the cost of the materials furnished by the latter. Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Pleasants"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "E. B. Glass, state\u2019s attorney, and Krome & Terry, attorneys for appellants.",
      "Henry S. Baker, Jr., and Alexander W. Hope, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "County of Madison v. William H. Halliburton.\n1. Counties\u2014Liability for Medical Aid to Persons not Paupers, efe.\u2014The fact that a county physician is under contract to treat the county poor at a stated salary does not preclude him from recovering for services rendered to persons (not paupers) injured by an explosion and requiring immediate medical aid.\nAssumpsit, for medical services. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jersey County; the Hon. Geo. W. Herdman, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the May term, 1895.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 6, 1895.\nE. B. Glass, state\u2019s attorney, and Krome & Terry, attorneys for appellants.\nHenry S. Baker, Jr., and Alexander W. Hope, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0099-01",
  "first_page_order": 97,
  "last_page_order": 97
}