{
  "id": 5174196,
  "name": "William Fitzgerald v. Frederick Hager, Adm'r of Theodore Karls",
  "name_abbreviation": "Fitzgerald v. Hager",
  "decision_date": "1896-06-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "385",
  "last_page": "386",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "64 Ill. App. 385"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 1341,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.545,
    "sha256": "f8c54b27d778f986912955c035b74db90715f2c19b06ecacd1c9e65fc69eca35",
    "simhash": "1:b78662ad597a9451",
    "word_count": 222
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:36.948645+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William Fitzgerald v. Frederick Hager, Adm\u2019r of Theodore Karls."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThe appellee is administrator of Theodore Karls, late an architect in Chicago, who commenced this suit in his lifetime to recover for professional services alleged to have been rendered by him to the appellant. The evidence was conflicting; by consent the court instructed the jury orally; how is not shown; and therefore the only question that could be in the case is whether the evidence warrants the verdict.\nThe most deliberate and solemn piece of evidence in the case, is an extract from a bill in chancery, filed and s.worn to by the appellant, which accords with the verdict, and it is impossible for this court to say that the jury ought not to have believed it.\nThe judgment is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. P. Black, attorney for appellant.",
      "Doolittle, Tolman & Pollasky, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William Fitzgerald v. Frederick Hager, Adm\u2019r of Theodore Karls.\n1. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Instructions not Shown by the Record.\u2014Where the instructions given to the jury are not shown by the record, the only question to be determined Is whether the evidence warrants the verdict.\nAssumpsit, for professional services. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Philip Stein, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1896.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 1, 1896.\nW. P. Black, attorney for appellant.\nDoolittle, Tolman & Pollasky, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0385-01",
  "first_page_order": 383,
  "last_page_order": 384
}