{
  "id": 5176221,
  "name": "Stephen S. Phillips v. Andrew Rehm",
  "name_abbreviation": "Phillips v. Rehm",
  "decision_date": "1896-06-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "477",
  "last_page": "477",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "64 Ill. App. 477"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "13 Ill. 544",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2582100
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/13/0544-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 114,
    "char_count": 1185,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.529,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15602106532079668
    },
    "sha256": "da99e0db3cb394e24bc3db2007da57f2c5523203ff62bd40cbd2fd9a5b3623e2",
    "simhash": "1:5f484cf2d469bf9c",
    "word_count": 203
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:36.948645+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Stephen S. Phillips v. Andrew Rehm."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThis was a suit for the price of hardware sold by the appellee to the appellant. On that part of the case there is no dispute. The defense was payment, as to which there is a conflict of evidence.\nThere is no evidence to justify an allowance of interest, either account stated, or unreasonable and vexatious delay of payment; yet over the objection and exception of the appellant, the appellee was permitted to prove that the interest amounted to $36.90, and that amount was included in the verdict and judgment, in addition to the original bill.\nThis was error. Sammis v. Clark, 13 Ill. 544, has been followed as the law.\nThe judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ernest Saunders, attorney for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Stephen S. Phillips v. Andrew Rehm.\n1. Interest\u2014When not to be Allowed.\u2014To entitle party to recover interest on an open account, delay of payment must be unreasonable and vexatious.\nAssumpsit, for goods sold and delivered. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Orrin N. Carter, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1896.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed June 1, 1896.\nErnest Saunders, attorney for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0477-01",
  "first_page_order": 475,
  "last_page_order": 475
}