{
  "id": 5185272,
  "name": "Henry N. Ferguson v. Chas. F. Adams Mfg. Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ferguson v. Chas. F. Adams Mfg. Co.",
  "decision_date": "1896-06-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "154",
  "last_page": "154",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "66 Ill. App. 154"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 98,
    "char_count": 947,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.512,
    "sha256": "4565aca78b683082932921307c440f2268656ef49e07c9b2ba101e8fae11e54a",
    "simhash": "1:8a87d2aad9d5b658",
    "word_count": 165
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:02:14.451346+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Henry N. Ferguson v. Chas. F. Adams Mfg. Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion per Curiam.\nAppellant has filed what purports to be an abstract of the record. It amounts to nothing more than a mere index to the record. Eule 20 of this court requires the appellant to furnish a complete abstract of the record in which shall appear the evidence in narrative form.\nThere is hot one word of evidence in what purports to be the abstract here. The motion which appellee makes to affirm judgment for want of sufficient abstract must prevail.\nThe judgment will be affirmed and judgment for the costs of this court rendered against the appellant.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Opinion per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles A. Kimmel, attorney for appellant.",
      "H. C. Fuller and E. J. Slough, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Henry N. Ferguson v. Chas. F. Adams Mfg. Co.\n1. Abstracts\u2014Of the Record.\u2014An index is not an abstract.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria County; the Hon. N. E. Worthington, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the December term, 1895,\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 1, 1896.\nCharles A. Kimmel, attorney for appellant.\nH. C. Fuller and E. J. Slough, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0154-01",
  "first_page_order": 150,
  "last_page_order": 150
}