{
  "id": 5188328,
  "name": "B. Franklin Cronkrite et al. v. William H. Rand et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cronkrite v. Rand",
  "decision_date": "1896-06-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "343",
  "last_page": "344",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "66 Ill. App. 343"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 91,
    "char_count": 850,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.504,
    "sha256": "b85457bb92773a6e3b66b11190651dae5089c52e7ceb681937ed7f9b3415ee58",
    "simhash": "1:98ae66a330fa8718",
    "word_count": 144
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:02:14.451346+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "B. Franklin Cronkrite et al. v. William H. Rand et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion per Curiam.\nThis cause having been retried in the Circuit Court upon the principles laid down in the opinion filed herein on the first appeal, and being now submitted by the parties for immediate decision, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed for the reasons stated in that opinion.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Opinion per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Flower, Smith & Musgrave, attorneys for appellants.",
      "George L. Paddock and H. T. Gilbert, attorneys for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "B. Franklin Cronkrite et al. v. William H. Rand et al.\n1. Practice\u2014Affirmance on Second Appeal.\u2014Where a case is reversed and remanded to the court below and again tried upon the principles laid down in the opinion, and is again appealed, it will be affirmed.\nAppeal, from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Charlfs G-. Neely, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1898.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 29, 1896.\nFlower, Smith & Musgrave, attorneys for appellants.\nGeorge L. Paddock and H. T. Gilbert, attorneys for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0343-01",
  "first_page_order": 339,
  "last_page_order": 340
}