{
  "id": 5189136,
  "name": "In the Matter of the Application of Voclav Harmanek, for his Discharge from Arrest at Suit of Sigmund Guthman et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Harmanek",
  "decision_date": "1896-11-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "593",
  "last_page": "594",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "66 Ill. App. 593"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "158 Ill. 272",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        6045801
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/158/0272-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "51 Ill. App. 222",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5115145
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/51/0222-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 124,
    "char_count": 1364,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.497,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.497341544922815e-08,
      "percentile": 0.39974299659941565
    },
    "sha256": "c112539d9ac7ab92ae6b436e762e05434d4b00944190d4da3a99fb2db32aa717",
    "simhash": "1:c7c356f36c498410",
    "word_count": 235
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:02:14.451346+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In the Matter of the Application of Voclav Harmanek, for his Discharge from Arrest at Suit of Sigmund Guthman et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nQuestions not easy of solution are suggested, but not presented, by this record. The appellee applied to the County Court to be discharged from arrest on a oa. sa. issued by a justice, and was there victorious.\nThe creditors appealed to the Circuit Court, the case was there tried by a jury, and the result was the same.\nThe Circuit Court had no jurisdiction of that appeal; it should have been to this court. Huntington v. Metzger, 51 Ill. App. 222; not reversed as to this point in 158 Ill. 272.\nThe judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to dismiss the appeal to that court. Reversed and remanded with directions.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hirer & Waters, attorneys for appellant.",
      "G-eorge G. Bellows, attorney for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In the Matter of the Application of Voclav Harmanek, for his Discharge from Arrest at Suit of Sigmund Guthman et al.\n1. Appeals\u2014From Orders of Discharge fromArrest. \u2014An appeal from an order of the County Court discharging a person from arrest on a co. set. issued by a justice of the peace must be taken to the Appellate Court.\nOrder of Discharge, etc.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Ttjthill, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1896.\nReversed and remanded with directions.\nOpinion filed November 19, 1896.\nHirer & Waters, attorneys for appellant.\nG-eorge G. Bellows, attorney for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0593-01",
  "first_page_order": 589,
  "last_page_order": 590
}