{
  "id": 5189184,
  "name": "North American Provision Company v. John E. Hart",
  "name_abbreviation": "North American Provision Co. v. Hart",
  "decision_date": "1896-11-30",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "659",
  "last_page": "659",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "66 Ill. App. 659"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 157,
    "char_count": 1667,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.473,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.345434925059198e-08,
      "percentile": 0.27328176275914157
    },
    "sha256": "78daeba6882183d786e2ca2f1ccb466b25ce9e6a70f80b5fb34a42d7fc21985e",
    "simhash": "1:9c87d4f212ae3b08",
    "word_count": 298
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:02:14.451346+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "North American Provision Company v. John E. Hart."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThe appellant had a warehouse in which meat was stored, and the appellee went there properly, to inspect some meat; but instead of going to any entrance used for persons to go in. or which the appellant in any way proffered as such an entrance, he went to a gate about seven feet high, and twelve to fifteen feet long, which was off its hinges, and probably not very securely fastened on the end to which the hinges belonged, and on the other end fastened by a hook into a staple, and either by putting his hand through a hole, lifting the hook and pulling the gate\u2014as he says\u2014or by attempting to climb the gate\u2014as all witnesses of the accident say\u2014the gate fell upon him and inflicted the injury for which he sues.\nOn either version, the injury was the result of his own carelessness, and he has no right to recover.\nThe judgment is reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Walker & Eddy, attorneys for appellant.",
      "William A. Doyle, attorney for appellee; M. Y. Gannon, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "North American Provision Company v. John E. Hart.\n1. Negligence\u2014Plaintiff's Carelessness a Bar to Recovery.\u2014In a suit where the plaintiff attempted to enter a warehouse through a gate not used as an entrance, and which the defendant in no way proffered as an entrance, and, the gate being out of order, fell upon him and injured him, held that the accident was the result of plaintiff\u2019s own carelessness and that he could not recover.\nTrespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Barton Payne, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1896.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed November 30, 1896.\nWalker & Eddy, attorneys for appellant.\nWilliam A. Doyle, attorney for appellee; M. Y. Gannon, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0659-01",
  "first_page_order": 655,
  "last_page_order": 655
}