{
  "id": 5190815,
  "name": "Henry P. Newman v. August Jacobson",
  "name_abbreviation": "Newman v. Jacobson",
  "decision_date": "1897-01-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "639",
  "last_page": "640",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "67 Ill. App. 639"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "59 Ill. App. 315",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5153527
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/59/0315-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 178,
    "char_count": 2006,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.531,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.1329240581850794e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5765050394829969
    },
    "sha256": "8ce57d36cba920fddafd73ead645d7d60d6629a7b679bf642238390a47e53041",
    "simhash": "1:f575cf89b2293249",
    "word_count": 350
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:00:34.097112+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Henry P. Newman v. August Jacobson."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion op the Court.\nThis is one of the cases in which enforcement of rules is unaccompanied by regret.\nThe appellant had occupied rooms of the appellee for several months, refusing to pay rent for them. The case was tried without a jury. The brief of the appellant is wholly to show that the court erred in the finding and judgment for the appellee because of a partial eviction of the appellant by the appellee; yet the abstract does not show the amount of the finding or judgment; nor anything as to the pleadings, further than, \u201c Declaration in debt for rent of certain premises.\u201d \u201c Plea, eviction of defendant by plaintiff.\u201d \u201c Replication to plea of eviction.\u201d\nWhether it was debt for use and occupation\u2014on a demise \u2014or upon a covenant to pay rent, is left in the dark. Whether the eviction pleaded was actual or constructive\u2014 of the whole, or a part, of the premises, or of some easement or appurtenance, is also so left.\nWhat replication was made to the plea, we are not informed.\nPerhaps no evidence shown by the abstract related to the issue joined. The appellant asks us to decide that a plea of eviction was proved, without showing us what it alleged.\nThe defense is not one that awakens any sympathy, and without repeating, we adopt so much of the opinion in Flaningham v. Hogue, 59 Ill. App. 315, as is applicable to this case, and affirm the judgment.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "L. S. Hodges, attorney for appellant.",
      "Thornton & Chancellor, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Henry P. Newman v. August Jacobson.\n1, Appellate Court Practice\u2014Abstracts.\u2014A party bringing a case to this court must furnish and file a complete abstract or abridgment of the record. The intention of the rule is to require a presentation in the abstract, in substance, of those parts of the record upon which error is assigned.\nDeM for Sent.\u2014Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Henry V. Freeman, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1896.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 7, 1897.\nL. S. Hodges, attorney for appellant.\nThornton & Chancellor, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0639-01",
  "first_page_order": 637,
  "last_page_order": 638
}
