{
  "id": 5193188,
  "name": "Oakland Hotel Company v. Emma Driscoll",
  "name_abbreviation": "Oakland Hotel Co. v. Driscoll",
  "decision_date": "1896-12-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "114",
  "last_page": "114",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "67 Ill. App. 114"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "132 Ill 492",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5418941
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/132/0492-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "58 Ill. App. 274",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5087321
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/58/0274-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "55 Ill. App. 457",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "50 Ill. App. 465",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5120542
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/50/0465-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 146,
    "char_count": 1476,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.55,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15619655817771616
    },
    "sha256": "323c1b453bc25eadc8c0448bb6d64209ea23ce14e54f8ec59cf719e887b59e97",
    "simhash": "1:b7cfe12ec6edfb4a",
    "word_count": 258
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:00:34.097112+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Oakland Hotel Company v. Emma Driscoll."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Shepard\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThere being no assignment of errors written upon or attached to the record filed in this cause, as required by the rule, and none appearing anywhere except in the abstract, 'there is nothing for this court to act upon. We refer to Lang v. Max, 50 Ill. App. 465, where many authorities are cited. Later decisions are, Hruby v. Vokoun, 55 Ill. App. 457, and Brown v. The H. W. Boies Co., 58 Ill. App. 274.\nWe may add that the point is urged in appellee\u2019s brief, filed as long ago as November 2, 1896, and that no motion for leave to remedy the defect has been made, as might hai7e been done.\nInstead, however, of dismissing the appeal, as was done in many of the cases referred to, we will follow a later authority of the Supreme Court, and affirm the judgment. Lancaster v. W. & S. Ry. Co., 132 Ill 492.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Shepard"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George B. Chamberlin, attorney for appellant.",
      "Whitfield & Driscoll, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Oakland Hotel Company v. Emma Driscoll.\n1. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Errors Must be Assigned.\u2014Where there is no assignment of errors written upon or attached to the record, as required by the rules of this court, and none appearing anywhere except in the abstract, the judgment will be affirmed.\nAssumpsit, for work, labor and services. Appeal from the County Court of Cook County; the Hon. Orrin N. Carter, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1896.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 14, 1896.\nGeorge B. Chamberlin, attorney for appellant.\nWhitfield & Driscoll, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0114-01",
  "first_page_order": 112,
  "last_page_order": 112
}
