{
  "id": 5190493,
  "name": "Harry Ryan v. Philip D. Armour et al.; Theodore P. Siddall, Jr., by his Next Friend, v. Egbert L. Jansen et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ryan v. Armour",
  "decision_date": "1896-11-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "102",
  "last_page": "103",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "67 Ill. App. 102"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "61 Ill. App. 314",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5160182
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/61/0314-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "61 Ill. App. 314",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5160182
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/61/0314-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 117,
    "char_count": 1163,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.521,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.3181068408277913e-07,
      "percentile": 0.789461663595059
    },
    "sha256": "8125f12ec834635c7765ccace0bf04d079733106f1c7bd4593c5ae5a43ebfc46",
    "simhash": "1:196263e33c5b78ed",
    "word_count": 197
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:00:34.097112+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Harry Ryan v. Philip D. Armour et al. Theodore P. Siddall, Jr., by his Next Friend, v. Egbert L. Jansen et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion per Curiam.\nEach of these cases, with the names of the parties reversed, has been here before. 61 Ill. App. 314; 51 Ibid. 74; 41 Ibid. 279.\nThe cases have now been again tried in accordance with the views of this court heretofore expressed, and still entertained, and therefore the judgments are now affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Opinion per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "King & Gross, attorneys for Henry Ryan, plaintiff in error; Andrew J. Hirsohl, of counsel.",
      "F. W. Becker and Dale & Francis, attorneys for Theodore P. Siddall Jr., plaintiff in error.",
      "Custer, Goddard & Griffin, attorneys for Philip D. Armour et al., defendants in error.",
      "Mason Brothers, attorneys for Egbert L. Jansen et al., defendants in error; Henry B. Mason, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Harry Ryan v. Philip D. Armour et al. Theodore P. Siddall, Jr., by his Next Friend, v. Egbert L. Jansen et al.\n1. Former Decisions.\u2014Views expressed in 61 Ill. App. 314, 61 Ibid. 74, and 41 Ibid. 379, approved.\nTrespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the\" Hon. Arthur H. Chetlain and the Hon. Nathaniel C. Sears, Judges, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1896.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November, 19, 1896.\nKing & Gross, attorneys for Henry Ryan, plaintiff in error; Andrew J. Hirsohl, of counsel.\nF. W. Becker and Dale & Francis, attorneys for Theodore P. Siddall Jr., plaintiff in error.\nCuster, Goddard & Griffin, attorneys for Philip D. Armour et al., defendants in error.\nMason Brothers, attorneys for Egbert L. Jansen et al., defendants in error; Henry B. Mason, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0102-01",
  "first_page_order": 100,
  "last_page_order": 101
}