{
  "id": 5194072,
  "name": "A. P. Benjamin v. William Beeler",
  "name_abbreviation": "Benjamin v. Beeler",
  "decision_date": "1896-11-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "366",
  "last_page": "367",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "67 Ill. App. 366"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1161,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.207966869300525e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3280863092790352
    },
    "sha256": "38b349c2c7bb6cc0e6705cf8b7ee1451458c753037622e6231ba6f37c37f019a",
    "simhash": "1:23d36b7c9c062720",
    "word_count": 186
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:00:34.097112+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "A. P. Benjamin v. William Beeler."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Boggs\ndelivered the opinion oe the Court.\nThe record herein presents only a question of fact, whether a verbal undertaking entered into by the appellant to pay $29 to the appellee was subject to a certain condition as claimed by appellant.\nThe jury found upon conflicting evidence and under instructions to which no objection is urged, the undertaking was not so conditioned.\nWe have carefully read the testimony. It is sufficient to support the verdict and there appears no reason to believe the jury were controlled or misled by passion, prejudice or mistake or that we should assume to declare their conclusion was palpably wrong.\nThe judgment is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Boggs"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Welty & Sterling, attorneys for appellant.",
      "J. J. Morrissey, attorney for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "A. P. Benjamin v. William Beeler.\n1. Verdicts\u2014Upon Conflicting Evidence.\u2014A verdict rendered upon conflicting evidence under proper instructions is conclusive upon questions of fact.\nTranscript, from a justice of the peace. Appeal from the County Court of McLean County; the Hon. O. D. Myers, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the May term, 1896.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November 21, 1896.\nWelty & Sterling, attorneys for appellant.\nJ. J. Morrissey, attorney for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0366-01",
  "first_page_order": 364,
  "last_page_order": 365
}