{
  "id": 5193509,
  "name": "Town of Pleasant v. Michael Clannin",
  "name_abbreviation": "Town of Pleasant v. Clannin",
  "decision_date": "1896-11-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "417",
  "last_page": "417",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "67 Ill. App. 417"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 147,
    "char_count": 1499,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.481,
    "sha256": "04a54f5b3d79fa71f6a3295bcf3f67389c8cc05c36404112e5f7e290b05457db",
    "simhash": "1:91d7ffbabc35cf04",
    "word_count": 255
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:00:34.097112+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Town of Pleasant v. Michael Clannin."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Boggs\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThis was an action under the statute to impose a fine upon appellee under the charge he had obstructed a public highway, by, as it was alleged, constructing a fence within the limits thereof.\nHe contended the fence was on the boundary line of his premises and the highway. The jury decided the question in his favor. The township appealed and asks reversal upon the sole ground the verdict is against the evidence.\nWe have read the testimony produced to the jury and considered the arguments (oral and printed) of counsel. The testimony was much in conflict; it was the peculiar province of the jury to determine the truth of the controversy. Ho reason appears why we should regard their findings as manifestly wrong, or to have been the result of passion, prejudice or mistake. The judgment is affirmed by the operation of the familiar rule applicable in such cases.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Boggs"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William A. Babcock and Harry M. Waggoner, attorneys for appellant.",
      "M. P. Rice, attorney for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Town of Pleasant v. Michael Clannin.\n1. Questions of Fact\u2014For the Jury.\u2014Where the testimony was conflicting and it does not appear that the verdict was manifestly wrong, or was the result of passion, prejudice or mistake, it will not be disturbed.\nTranscript, from a justice of the peace. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Fulton County; the Hon. Jefferson Orb, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the May term, 1896.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November 21, 1896.\nWilliam A. Babcock and Harry M. Waggoner, attorneys for appellant.\nM. P. Rice, attorney for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0417-01",
  "first_page_order": 415,
  "last_page_order": 415
}