{
  "id": 5199385,
  "name": "C. E. Dorn and Gay Dorn v. James Clancy & Son",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dorn v. James Clancy & Son",
  "decision_date": "1897-01-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "421",
  "last_page": "421",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "68 Ill. App. 421"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 106,
    "char_count": 997,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.51,
    "sha256": "4dba0e5d1aee8148c11a0c15d0bc7cb96ea8384f472e30ad4e0d905f0b5e3376",
    "simhash": "1:47ed476dd1db1210",
    "word_count": 172
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:19:54.666299+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "C. E. Dorn and Gay Dorn v. James Clancy & Son."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThis case comes here on an original record, which\u2014 upon proceedings here, which it is not necessary to detail\u2014 was admitted to be, in part, no record, and upon three' supplemental records, to which there is no allusion in the-abstract. Unless we disregard rules of this court, which we must enforce impartially or not at all, we can not inquire as to the merits of the case. Thompson v. Economy Furniture Company, 64 111. App. 140.\nThe judgment is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles Piokler, attorney for appellants.",
      "William A. Doyle, attorney for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "C. E. Dorn and Gay Dorn v. James Clancy & Son.\n1. Rules of Court\u2014Must be Complied With.\u2014Unless the rules are complied with, the court can not inquire into the merits of the case.\nTranscript, from a justice of the peace. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard 8. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1896.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 21, 1897.\nCharles Piokler, attorney for appellants.\nWilliam A. Doyle, attorney for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0421-01",
  "first_page_order": 419,
  "last_page_order": 419
}