{
  "id": 5201557,
  "name": "Lindgren-Mahan Chemical Fire Engine Company v. J. F. Senger",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lindgren-Mahan Chemical Fire Engine Co. v. Senger",
  "decision_date": "1897-03-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "40",
  "last_page": "40",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "69 Ill. App. 40"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 142,
    "char_count": 1812,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.556,
    "sha256": "483b1ded49923f0088e404e5df84f981aaea2f2970ca2fab342427a2457b48c4",
    "simhash": "1:a5abf51a5d9e6879",
    "word_count": 320
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:55:23.961114+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Lindgren-Mahan Chemical Fire Engine Company v. J. F. Senger."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Hr. Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion oe the Court.\nThe appellee sued the appellant for wages. The defense was that the appellee slighted his work.\nThe jury chose to believe the testimony on behalf of the appellee, rather than that on behalf of the appellant, as to the truthfulness of that defense, and their verdict is final. The case was tried upon a \u201cshort cause calendar,\u201d and the appellant urges that the court wrongly denied its motion to strike the case off that calendar because the notice served stated that an affidavit had been filed, and the attorney at once went to the clerk\u2019s office, and found there no affidavit where it ought to have been, if filed, nor any registry of such affidavit.\nIt does not appear that he made any inquiry for the \u2022affidavit, nor does it appear whether such affidavit was in fact then on file or not.\nThere is no error, and the judgment is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Hr. Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Allan C. and Feed W. Story, attorneys for appellant.",
      "Jos. W. Errant and W. H. Troyer, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Lindgren-Mahan Chemical Fire Engine Company v. J. F. Senger.\n1. Short Cause Calendar\u2014Motion to Strike Cause from.\u2014It was alleged in support of amotion to strike a case from the \u201cshort cause calendar \u201d that the attorney making the motion went to the clerk\u2019s office, on receiving notice that the necessary affidavit had been filed, but found no affidavit where it ought to have been, if filed, nor any registry of such affidavit. It did not appear that he made any inquiry for the affidavit, nor whether such affidavit was in fact then on file or not. Held, that the motion was properly denied.\nTranscript from a Justice of the Peace.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edmund W. Burke, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1896.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 8, 1897.\nAllan C. and Feed W. Story, attorneys for appellant.\nJos. W. Errant and W. H. Troyer, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0040-01",
  "first_page_order": 38,
  "last_page_order": 38
}
