{
  "id": 5200701,
  "name": "William J. Brownell v. Brattleboro Savings Bank; Same v. Elizabeth R. Boughter; Same v. John Gray",
  "name_abbreviation": "Brownell v. Brattleboro Savings Bank",
  "decision_date": "1897-03-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "122",
  "last_page": "122",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "69 Ill. App. 122"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "44 Ill. App. 238",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5069732
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/44/0238-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "89 Ill. 498",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        826278
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/89/0498-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "66 Ill. 53",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2621344
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/66/0053-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 137,
    "char_count": 1699,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.533,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.8591662004228935e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3662228956205555
    },
    "sha256": "96c7594412bddd0252f161b65de7ad587d168489e52b228808d48bb05fb1e2a0",
    "simhash": "1:2cce42ac408b50f0",
    "word_count": 279
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:55:23.961114+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William J. Brownell v. Brattleboro Savings Bank. Same v. Elizabeth R. Boughter. Same v. John Gray."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThese are appeals from deficiency decrees after distributing the proceeds of the sales under foreclosure decrees. The first dozen assigned errors are to the foreclosure decrees, which are not before us for review on these appeals. An appeal from a decree can be taken only at the term at which the decree is entered. If subsequent proceedings are founded upon it, and an appeal prosecuted from an order or decree entered in such subsequent proceedings, any attack then upon the original decree is but collateral, and mere error is immaterial. Freeman v. Freeman, 66 Ill. 53; Haas v. Chicago Building Soc., 89 Ill. 498; Campbell v. Jacobson, 44 Ill. App. 238.\nThe errors alleged as to the deficiency decrees are supported neither by the record nor by argument.\nThe three cases are, as to questions involved, exactly alike, and the decrees are affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William E. Hughes, attorney for appellant.",
      "Stillman & Martyn, attorneys for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William J. Brownell v. Brattleboro Savings Bank. Same v. Elizabeth R. Boughter. Same v. John Gray.\n1. Appeal\u2014From Orders in Subsequent Proceedings\u2014-Effect on Original Decree.-\u2014An appeal from a decree can be taken only at the term at which the decree is entered. If subsequent proceedings are founded upon such decree and an appeal prosecuted from an order or decree entered in such subsequent proceedings, any attack in such appeal upon the original decree is but collateral, and mere error is immaterial.\nBill for Foreclosure.\u2014Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1896.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 8, 1897.\nWilliam E. Hughes, attorney for appellant.\nStillman & Martyn, attorneys for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0122-01",
  "first_page_order": 120,
  "last_page_order": 120
}