{
  "id": 4838790,
  "name": "Samuel Neimeyer v. James Knight et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Neimeyer v. Knight",
  "decision_date": "1880-09-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "200",
  "last_page": "200",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "7 Ill. App. 200"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 1242,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.483,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.770845263994211e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4119792312215886
    },
    "sha256": "00beb7b86e58ab696a4cd00d19a1991ddd88e83d62ceff5f3fd457fbf036cddf",
    "simhash": "1:607d9ca062500238",
    "word_count": 212
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:15:10.588151+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Samuel Neimeyer v. James Knight et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis was a bill in chancery brought by appellants against appellees, to cancel and declare void and of no effect a deed made by appellant to appellee Knight, conveying certain lands in fee.\nThe bill prays that the deed be cancelled, and that complainant be restored to the title and possession of the premises.\nA demurrer was sustained to the bill, and a decree rendered dismissing the same at complainant\u2019s costs, from which an appeal is prosecuted to this court.\nThe case involves a freehold, and this court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine it. The appeal should have been to the Supreme Court. Board of Trustees v. Carrie Beal, 6 Bradwell, 536; and Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, ante 191, decided at the present term of this court.\nThe appeal is dismissed.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. C. A. Egberts, for appellant.",
      "Mr. A. B. Sawyer and Messrs. Green & Coers, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Samuel Neimeyer v. James Knight et al.\nAppellate jurisdiction \u2014 Freehold.\u2014This was an action to set aside and declare void a certain deed, and as it involves the question of a freehold this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Tazewell county; the Hon. H. M. Laws, Judge, presiding.\nOpinion filed September 29, 1880.\nMr. C. A. Egberts, for appellant.\nMr. A. B. Sawyer and Messrs. Green & Coers, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0200-01",
  "first_page_order": 196,
  "last_page_order": 196
}