{
  "id": 5251642,
  "name": "William Barrow v. Leanore Sligh",
  "name_abbreviation": "Barrow v. Sligh",
  "decision_date": "1897-06-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "319",
  "last_page": "319",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "70 Ill. App. 319"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 88,
    "char_count": 906,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "sha256": "c9414348444c7b18126dc661052709bac01c7323b1131ebab2860063eb03142e",
    "simhash": "1:98ac0e2ae8b4c238",
    "word_count": 147
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:32:17.018382+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William Barrow v. Leanore Sligh."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gary\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThis is a suit by the appellee against the appellant for wages, and the Circuit Court added to the verdict in her favor attorney fees as part of the judgment.\nThe appellant argues that the statute under which the court acted is unconstitutional.\nThat argument ousts this court of jurisdiction. Bernstein v. People, page 175 this volume.\nThe appeal is dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gary"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "S\". y. Cronholm, attorney for appellant.",
      "John W. Richey, attorney for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William Barrow v. Leanore Sligh.\n1. Appellate Courts\u2014Jurisdiction of, as to Constitutional Questions.\u2014This court has no jurisdiction of cases involving the constitutionality of a statute.\nTranscript, from a justice of the peace. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Dunne, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1897.\nAppeal dismissed.\nOpinion filed June 14, 1897.\nS\". y. Cronholm, attorney for appellant.\nJohn W. Richey, attorney for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0319-01",
  "first_page_order": 319,
  "last_page_order": 319
}