{
  "id": 2453907,
  "name": "Mary Kurtz v. William H. H. Kurtz",
  "name_abbreviation": "Kurtz v. Kurtz",
  "decision_date": "1897-09-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "71",
  "last_page": "72",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "71 Ill. App. 71"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 87,
    "char_count": 862,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.138363859351185e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4695989997872463
    },
    "sha256": "b978336afb32fd5068189f6ccab247d0d107688d7d22c466ff22b32a32e9d42a",
    "simhash": "1:0a57e4eacb2a9668",
    "word_count": 147
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:20:26.715064+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Mary Kurtz v. William H. H. Kurtz."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion pee Cueiam.\nDefendant in error having failed to file his brief in compliance with the requirements of the rules of this court, and no sufficient reason or excuse having been offered for such failure, the decree is therefore reversed and the cause remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Opinion pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "C. L. Y. Mulkey, attorney for plaintiff in error; Thomas B. Love, of counsel.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Mary Kurtz v. William H. H. Kurtz.\n1. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Briefs Must he Filed as Required hy the Rules.\u2014The decree in this case is reversed and the cause remanded on account of the failure of defendant in error to file briefs as required by the rules of the court. .\nSeparate Maintenance.\u2014Error to the Circuit Court of Massac County; the Hon. Alonzo K. Vickers, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the February term, 1897.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed September 10, 1897.\nC. L. Y. Mulkey, attorney for plaintiff in error; Thomas B. Love, of counsel.\nNo appearance for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0071-01",
  "first_page_order": 69,
  "last_page_order": 70
}