{
  "id": 2451373,
  "name": "Oskamp, Nolting & Co. v. A. D. Jones",
  "name_abbreviation": "Oskamp, Nolting & Co. v. Jones",
  "decision_date": "1897-09-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "72",
  "last_page": "73",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "71 Ill. App. 72"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "68 Ill. App. 602",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "23 Ill. App. 482",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        863618
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/23/0482-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 123,
    "char_count": 1356,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.519,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08098618877007888
    },
    "sha256": "490653ec416b204b31fe2fd1c9d071a1779782751388854d6bb0a70d33a6c101",
    "simhash": "1:2e621b2b3e87a1d1",
    "word_count": 233
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:20:26.715064+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Oskamp, Nolting & Co. v. A. D. Jones."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion per Curiam.\nNeither the record, nor the bill of exceptions filed here shows any exception to the finding or judgment of the court, or that there was a motion made for a new trial, or that there were any propositions of law submitted to the court.\nThere is nothing then for this court to review. Wolf v. Campbell, 23 Ill. App. 482.\n\u201c The rule is inflexible that without an' exception preserved in the bill of exceptions, no ruling, however improper, that does not relate to the pleadings or appear on the face of the judgment, can be reviewed in an appellate tribunal.\u201d Kennedy v. I. C. R. R. Co., 68 Ill. App. 602.\nMany cases might be cited to the same effect.\nJudgment of court below affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Opinion per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Plannigan & Payne and Cobb & Howard, attorneys for appellant.",
      "Hart & Spilleb, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Oskamp, Nolting & Co. v. A. D. Jones.\n1. Practice\u2014What Errors can Be Considered on Appeal.\u2014The rule is inflexible that without an exception preserved in the bill of exceptions, no ruling, however improper, that does not relate to the pleadings or appear on the face of the judgment, can be reviewed in an appellate tribunal.\nAssumpsit, for goods sold and delivered. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Franklin County; the Hon. Oliver A. Harder, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the August term, 1897.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed September 10, 1897.\nPlannigan & Payne and Cobb & Howard, attorneys for appellant.\nHart & Spilleb, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0072-01",
  "first_page_order": 70,
  "last_page_order": 71
}