{
  "id": 2452273,
  "name": "Bauer Grocer Co. et al. v. F. E. Zelle",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bauer Grocer Co. v. Zelle",
  "decision_date": "1897-09-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "73",
  "last_page": "74",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "71 Ill. App. 73"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "11 Ill. App. 114",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5778097
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/11/0114-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 Ill. App. 401",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4836639
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/7/0401-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 Ill. App. 398",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4831273
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/7/0398-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 Ill. App. 506",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4835651
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/7/0506-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 Ill. App. 200",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4838790
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/7/0200-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 Ill. App. 191",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4839060
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/7/0191-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "6 Ill. App. 536",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4745089,
        4746375
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/6/0536-01",
        "/ill-app/6/0536-02"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 141,
    "char_count": 1701,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.598,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08099429735092664
    },
    "sha256": "77383309802cb0e5256a91823cce76fafacb8ef45a1f07bd97e64fdafdb12b31",
    "simhash": "1:4d051635b2e200b8",
    "word_count": 301
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:20:26.715064+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Bauer Grocer Co. et al. v. F. E. Zelle."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion per Curiam.\nThe decree in this case is upon a supplemental bill filed by appellee against appellant, to cancel and set aside, \u00e1s cloud on the title of appellee, certain deeds to real estate held by appellants, which deeds convey said real estate to appellants in fee.\nThe principal prayer of the bill is: \u201c That said deeds may be ordered canceled and set aside as a cloud on the title of complainant\u201d (appellee). The principal provision in the decree is, that the deeds of appellants be set aside and decreed null and void as a cloud upon the title of appellee to said premises.\nThis case involves a freehold, and this court has no jurisdiction to hear and.determine it. The appeal should have been to the Supreme Court. Board of Trustees v. Beale, 6 Ill. App. 536; Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 7 Ill. App. 191; Neimeyer v. Knight et al., 7 Ill. App. 200; Whitehead v. Alexander, 7 Ill. App. 506; Robinson v. Peterson, 7 Ill. App. 398; Hawley v. Simons, 7 Ill. App. 401; Dobbins v. Cruger, et al., 11 Ill. App. 114.\nThe appeal is dismissed. Leave to appellants to withdraw record and files.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Opinion per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hadley & Burton, attorneys for appellant.",
      "Wm. H. Temme, attorney for appellee. \\"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Bauer Grocer Co. et al. v. F. E. Zelle.\n1. Appeals and Errors\u2014Involving a Freehold.\u2014A bill praying that certain deeds be canceled and set aside as a cloud on the title of the complainant, involves a freehold, and this court has no jurisdiction of an appeal from a decree granting the prayer of such a bill.\nBill, to set aside a deed. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Madison County; the Hon. Benjamin R. Burroughs, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the August term, 1897.\nDismissed.\nOpinion filed September 10, 1897.\nHadley & Burton, attorneys for appellant.\nWm. H. Temme, attorney for appellee. \\"
  },
  "file_name": "0073-01",
  "first_page_order": 71,
  "last_page_order": 72
}