{
  "id": 5239526,
  "name": "Charles F. Offutt v. World's Columbian Exposition",
  "name_abbreviation": "Offutt v. World's Columbian Exposition",
  "decision_date": "1898-01-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "231",
  "last_page": "232",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "73 Ill. App. 231"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 108,
    "char_count": 1007,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.497,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.044348983065606e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4248334555412304
    },
    "sha256": "58ad4b97000078e883aa368e3e7b323b0815fcf406e9d61913fb54c905be04f5",
    "simhash": "1:cbea13fdf3cce04c",
    "word_count": 173
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:07:49.615974+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles F. Offutt v. World\u2019s Columbian Exposition."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam\nThis case was tried in the lower court before Judge WiNDES,then sitting on the circuit bench; hence he did not participate in the consideration of the case.\nThere is a division of opinion between the remaining justices, and the case is therefore affirmed by a divided court, and no opinion will be filed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Henry D. Beam, William R. Rummler, and Robert W. McCulloch, attorneys for plaintiff in error.",
      "John A. Post, and John B. Brady, attorneys for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles F. Offutt v. World\u2019s Columbian Exposition.\nAppellate Court Practice\u2014Where the Court is Evenly Divided.\u2014 When only two of the judges of this court take part in the consideration of a ease, if they are divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should he affirmed or reversed, it must be affirmed.\nTrespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon., Thomas G. Wihdes, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1897.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 27, 1898.\nHenry D. Beam, William R. Rummler, and Robert W. McCulloch, attorneys for plaintiff in error.\nJohn A. Post, and John B. Brady, attorneys for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0231-01",
  "first_page_order": 231,
  "last_page_order": 232
}