{
  "id": 5238205,
  "name": "Helen Thompson & Robert Bullen v. The People, etc.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bullen v. People",
  "decision_date": "1898-01-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "258",
  "last_page": "261",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "73 Ill. App. 258"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 225,
    "char_count": 3975,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.493,
    "sha256": "c9f9f8c470c13572cdbdbd9aa4d87de30e8fc4963f6b0a21836d94392f8b074d",
    "simhash": "1:3899e9fed43b43e2",
    "word_count": 670
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:07:49.615974+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Helen Thompson & Robert Bullen v. The People, etc."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Sears\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThe record in this cause shows that on the eleventh day of December, 1895, there was filed in the Criminal Court of Cook County a recognizance taken on the seventh of the same month by Gr. W. Underwood, justice of the peace, which recited that on that day Helen Thompson was examined before said justice on a charge preferred against her of \u201cVio Sec. 137 E, Oh, 38,\u201d and was required by said justice to give \u2022bonds for her appearance to answer said charge. The recognizance is thus conditioned. \u201cNow, the condition of this recognizance is such that if the above bonnden Helen Thompson^shall personally be and appear before the Criminal Court of Cook County on the first day of the next term thereof to be held \u2018on the first Monday in January, 1895,7 'then and there to answer to said People on said charge, etc., then this recognizance to become void, etc.\n[Signed] \u201cHelen Thompson, (seal), \u201cB. T. Bullen, (seal).\u201d\nThe record further shows that on the twenty-first of May, 1897, in said Criminal Court, said Helen Thompson was \u201ccalled in open court to answer to an indictment for selling pools, etc.,\u201d came not but was defaulted, that thereupon said Bobert Bullen was three times .demanded that he bring the body of said Helen Thompson into court, but did not, and default was duly entered. Thereupon a scire facias was issued, which scire facias avers that \u201con the 7th day of December, 1896, Helen Thompson .and Robert Bullen appeared before said justice and entered into the recognizance,\u201d as above; that at the May term, 1897, \u201csaid Helen Thompson was three times solemnly called to answer to the charge preferred against her in said recognizance as set fourth,\u201d came not,' but was defaulted, and said Robert F. Bullen being three times solemnly demanded that he bring the body of said Helen Thompson into court, failed to do so, but made default, which was entered of record, and their recognizance declared forfeited. Therefore the sheriff is commanded to summons said Helen Thompson and Robert F. Bullen to appear and show cause why said forfeiture should not be absolute.\nThe scire facias is indorsed: \u201cThe within named defendants not found in my county this 5th day of July, 1897.\n\u201cJames Pease, Sheriff,\n\u201cBy W. H. Pease, Deputy.\u201d\nThe record further recites that on the eighth of July, 1897, it appearing to the court that said scire facias \u201chas been duly returned by the sheriff of Cook County,\u201d the said forfeiture was \u201cdeclared absolute,\u201d and judgment for $500 and costs rendered against said obligors.\nFrom the supplemental record it appears that on the second day of January, 1896, and of the December term, 1895, of the Criminal Court of Cook County, an indictment was returned against said Thompson for selling pools, etc., that upon the fifteenth day of January, 1896, said Thompson appeared before the Criminal court and entered into recognizance there, with surety, for her appearance in said court to answer unto the People, etc., upon the indictment. This operated to render the former recognizance in the same cause functus officio.\nThe proceedings of the May term, 1897, of the court and the judgment of July 8, 1897, were therefore erroneous.\nThe judgment is reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Sears"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "E. A. Sherburne, attorney for plaintiffs in error.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Helen Thompson & Robert Bullen v. The People, etc.\n1. Recognizances\u2014Effect of Taking New Beeogniemee.\u2014If after a recognizance is taken before a justice of the peace an indictment is returned and the party appears before the court and enters into a recognizance to appear and answer the indictment, such action will operate to render the former recognizance in the same cause functus officio and a judgment of forfeiture thereof will be erroneous.\nForfeiture of Recognizance. Error to the Criminal Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlih Q. Ball, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1897.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed January 27, 1898.\nE. A. Sherburne, attorney for plaintiffs in error.\nNo appearance for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0258-01",
  "first_page_order": 258,
  "last_page_order": 261
}