{
  "id": 5235308,
  "name": "Joseph Jacoba v. Hiram A. Draper",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jacoba v. Draper",
  "decision_date": "1898-03-03",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "457",
  "last_page": "457",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "74 Ill. App. 457"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "119 Ill. 135",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2901822
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/119/0135-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "43 Ill. App. 363",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5054474
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/43/0363-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1849,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.606,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15669600814564866
    },
    "sha256": "6193fe10c351d2b08bb3881eb4d5686dd4bae353211b3252b5d0d7b1323f1813",
    "simhash": "1:292668e25fa70a28",
    "word_count": 314
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:43:46.097587+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Joseph Jacoba v. Hiram A. Draper."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Windes\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nAppellant was sued by appellee before a justice of the peace in forcible detainer for a farm. Appellee recovered j udgment for possession, and appellant appealed to the Circuit Court, where a trial before the court and a jury resulted in a like judgment, the court having instructed the jury, at the close of all the evidence, to find the defendant guilty.\nNo errors are assigned on the record or attached thereto, as required by Rule 12 of this court. It is true appellant, on motion, after appellee\u2019s brief was filed, in which the point was made that no errors were assigned on the record, obtained leave to assign errors and filed a paper not attached to the record, containing an assignment of errors. That was not a compliance with the rule and is sufficient cause for dismissing the appeal. Conlon v. Manning, 43 Ill. App. 363, and cases cited; Benneson v. Savage, 119 Ill. 135, and cases cited.\nWe have, however, examined fully the record and the points made by appellant\u2019s brief, and find no reversible error.\nThe appeal is dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Windes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "A. J. Redmond, attorney for appellant.",
      "Crafts & Stevens, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Joseph Jacoba v. Hiram A. Draper.\n1. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Assignment of Errors\u2014 In this case no errors were assigned on the record or attached thereto, as required by the rules of the court, but after appellee\u2019s brief was filed appellant obtained leave to assign errors, and filed a paper containing an assignment of error. Held, that this was not a compliance with the rules, and that the appeal might properly be dismissed.\nForcible Detainer, commenced before a justice of the peace. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1897.\nAppeal dismissed.\nOpinion filed March 3, 1898.\nA. J. Redmond, attorney for appellant.\nCrafts & Stevens, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0457-01",
  "first_page_order": 455,
  "last_page_order": 455
}