{
  "id": 5791143,
  "name": "Adolph Arnold, Herman Arnold, Theodore Arnold and Benjamin F. Baker v. Albert Kilchman",
  "name_abbreviation": "Arnold v. Kilchman",
  "decision_date": "1898-06-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "665",
  "last_page": "666",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "76 Ill. App. 665"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 143,
    "char_count": 1770,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.617,
    "sha256": "16b089bfe3c25ab2617e6dd1afbd069e86cb80bd60ba969ed832a3fe744b19f1",
    "simhash": "1:daed1d71e0005718",
    "word_count": 282
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:12:45.168189+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Adolph Arnold, Herman Arnold, Theodore Arnold and Benjamin F. Baker v. Albert Kilchman."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Horton\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis appeal must be dismissed for the reason that there is no judgment against appellants. -The suit was brought against the four appellants, Adolph Arnold, Theodore-Arnold, Herman Arnold and Benjamin F. Baker, together with Gustav A. Bodenschatz and Arthur J. Howe. Upon the trial the jury returned a verdict finding the issues, joined between appellee and appellants, for the appellee, and assessing appellee\u2019s damages only against said Bodenschatz and Howe. The damages thus assessed are for the sum of $532.39. A motion for a new trial, apparently by all of the defendants below, was overruled. Judgment was thereupon entered against the defendants Bodenschatz and Howe, and against.them only. This record shows no judgment of any kind against the appellants. Bodenschatz and Howe do not, nor does either one of them, join in this appeal. Although a person be a party defendant to a suit in which a judgment is entered against'his co-defendant, he can not appeal when there is no judgment of any kind against him.\nThis appeal from the Circuit Court will be dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Horton"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Eschenburg & Whitfield and Samson & Wilcox, attorneys for appellants.",
      "Walther & Lanaghen, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Adolph Arnold, Herman Arnold, Theodore Arnold and Benjamin F. Baker v. Albert Kilchman.\n1. Appeals\u2014Where There is No Judgment.\u2014Where the record fails to show a judgment against the party appealing the appeal will be dismissed.\nAssumpsit, for moneys deposited in a bank. Trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding. Verdict for plaintiff, etc.; appeal by defendants.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court, First District, at the March term, 1898.\nAppeal dismissed.\nOpinion filed June 21, 1898.\nEschenburg & Whitfield and Samson & Wilcox, attorneys for appellants.\nWalther & Lanaghen, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0665-01",
  "first_page_order": 663,
  "last_page_order": 664
}