{
  "id": 5223793,
  "name": "Henry Ording, Jr., v. William H. Burnet",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ording v. Burnet",
  "decision_date": "1898-07-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "220",
  "last_page": "221",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "77 Ill. App. 220"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "46 Ill. 102",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5296151
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "106"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/46/0102-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1277,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.601,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7508198354421436
    },
    "sha256": "8634c9879dc8d89f135bb5758fd4fff3bfb626a07395605baca023511bab45f5",
    "simhash": "1:90c1bf0d70a0f5d0",
    "word_count": 212
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:36:43.320990+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Henry Ording, Jr., v. William H. Burnet."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Freeman\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis is a foreclosure suit, in which the notes secured by the trust deed were introduced in evidence. The master reported the amount of principal and interest due according to the tenor and effect of the said notes, and a decree was entered accordingly and sale of the premises ordered. The complainant made out & prima, facie case by producing the notes and deed of trust. Douglas v. Pfeiffer et al., 46 Ill. 102, 106.\nHo testimony was offered in behalf of appellant. Interest was properly allowed, and there is no claim it was not correctly calculated.\nThis appeal appears to have been prosecuted only for delay. The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Freeman"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles Pickler, attorney for appellant.",
      "Oliver & Meoartnet, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Henry Ording, Jr., v. William H. Burnet.\n1. Practice\u2014Prima Facie Case.\u2014In foreclosing a trust deed the complainant makes out a prima facie case by producing the notes and deed of trust.\nForeclosure.\u2014Trust deed. Trial in the Circuit Court, Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding. Hearing and decree for complainant. Appeal by defendant.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court of the First District, at the March term, 1898.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed July 16, 1898.\nCharles Pickler, attorney for appellant.\nOliver & Meoartnet, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0220-01",
  "first_page_order": 222,
  "last_page_order": 223
}
