{
  "id": 5224507,
  "name": "In the Matter of the Petition of the Eichenbaum Plumbing Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re the Eichenbaum Plumbing Co.",
  "decision_date": "1898-06-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "363",
  "last_page": "364",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "77 Ill. App. 363"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 1946,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.615,
    "sha256": "028aa631062d1b0435372e1de77da8e76c1fb9186e079e33da8ea363b23c23a3",
    "simhash": "1:eaa182140225d4be",
    "word_count": 340
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:36:43.320990+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In the Matter of the Petition of the Eichenbaum Plumbing Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Adams\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the, Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, judge of the Superior Court, to sign a certif\u00edcate of evidence. The certificate presented to him for signature is attached to the petition. The respondent has filed a demurrer. The certificate presented for signature purports to contain the evidence read on a motion to set aside an order of the court appointing a receiver in th\u00e9 case of Elias Levee et al. v. Paul Eichenbaum et al., which case is pending in this court on appeal from the order appointing the receiver. This court can only issue the writ of mandamus in aid of its jurisdiction, and a certificate of evidence on a motion to set aside an order appointing a receiver would not be in aid of the jurisdiction of the court in the appeal from the order appointing the receives. \u25a0 The order overruling the motion to set aside the order appointing the receiver is not .an .appealable order. The certificate, if signed, could not in anjr way aid the court in the appeal case. It would be wholly irrelevant, .The demurrer will be sustained.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Adams"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Martin & Martin and J. H. Felton, attorneys for petitioner.",
      "B. M. Shaffner, attorney for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In the Matter of the Petition of the Eichenbaum Plumbing Co.\n1. Mandamus\u2014When it Will Issue from. This Court.\u2014The Appellate Court can only issue a writ of mandamus in aid of its jurisdiction.\n2. Appellate Court\u2014What is Notin Aid of its Jurisdiction.\u2014The granting of a certificate of evidence on a motion to set aside an order appointing a receiver is not in aid of the jurisdiction of the Appellate Court in the appeal from such order.\n3. Appellate Court Practice\u2014What is Not an Appealable Order. \u2014An order overruling a motion to set aside an order appointing a receiver is not an appealable order.\nMandamus.\u2014Original proceedings in this court. Demurrer to petition sustained.\nOpinion filed June 9, 1898.\nMartin & Martin and J. H. Felton, attorneys for petitioner.\nB. M. Shaffner, attorney for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0363-01",
  "first_page_order": 365,
  "last_page_order": 366
}