{
  "id": 5223292,
  "name": "William H. Hallermann, Guy C. Barkley and Fred Feulner v. The Baltimore & Ohio South-Western Railway Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hallermann v. Baltimore & Ohio South-Western Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1898-08-31",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "404",
  "last_page": "405",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "77 Ill. App. 404"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 91,
    "char_count": 1132,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.555,
    "sha256": "8bb9ff1b62f169e575102c062db62cced91023ebd6efd336ebce26c814a71794",
    "simhash": "1:149f530a202d8683",
    "word_count": 183
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:36:43.320990+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William H. Hallermann, Guy C. Barkley and Fred Feulner v. The Baltimore & Ohio South-Western Railway Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Worthington\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis case was tried in the Circuit Court by agreement with the case of the Carlyle Canning Co. v. The Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Company. The same questions are involved in both cases, and the records are substantially alike. The opinion of the court in the Carlyle Canning Co. v. The Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Company, sufra, is adopted as the opinion in this case.\nJudgment reversed and case remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Worthington"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "R W. Barger and M. P. Murray, attorneys for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Palmer, Shutt, Hamill & Lester and Van Hoorebeke & Louden, attorneys for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William H. Hallermann, Guy C. Barkley and Fred Feulner v. The Baltimore & Ohio South-Western Railway Co.\n1. Opinion in Former Case\u2014Adopted.\u2014The opinion of the court in Carlyle Canning Co. v. The Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Company, supra, is adopted as the opinion in this case.\nError, to the Circuit.,Court of Clinton County; the Hon. Alonzo S. Wilderman, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the February term, 1898.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed August 31, 1898.\nR W. Barger and M. P. Murray, attorneys for plaintiffs in error.\nPalmer, Shutt, Hamill & Lester and Van Hoorebeke & Louden, attorneys for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0404-01",
  "first_page_order": 406,
  "last_page_order": 407
}